answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How much space was there left on the lifeboats on the titanic?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Movies & Television

What did the Titanic not have anough of?

The Titanic didn't have enough lifeboats. It had only 20 lifeboats and it was only enough for half of the maximum capacity of passengers and crew, which was 2,435 passengers and 892 crew members. The 20 lifeboats could've only held 1,178 people, but some of the boats were only launched half-full since the crew members thought that too much weight would cause the lifeboats to swamp, or sink


Why didn't they have more lifeboats on the Titanic?

It was widely believed to be unsinkable. The design and construction were supposedly such that the risk of sinking was considered virtually nil. See the Snopes page linked below.Not only did they not have enough life boats, but they were not filled properly. For example, lifeboat 2 had 28 people when it could hold 65.The life boats were actually designed to be able to be stacked inside of each other, but the people who put them on board thought that the deck would look too cluttered if they put the required number of life boats on board.there was not any space on the titanic to fit all the ship.!!!!Today, it seems baffling that the number of lifeboats on the Titanic met maritime standards. Representations about the Titanic's then-advanced design have been reduced to misleading sound bites and conflated with details of a strangely-prescient 19th century novel about a strikingly similar disaster befalling a purportedly unsinkable ship ("The Titan"). This has led to the meme that because the Titanic was considered "unsinkable," she didn't carry enough lifeboats.The Titanic was actually claimed to be disaster proof rather than unsinkable. The notion was that even if the Titanic sank, it would take so long to do so, and proceed in such a way, no lives would be lost apart from any lost in the initial collision, explosion or other incident leading to the event. Her sister ship, the Olympic, had collided with a Royal Naval warship and made it back to port. (The warship fared far worse.)The reason the Titanic's maiden voyage became a famous disaster nonetheless was because of lethal miscalculations in a literal, mathematical sense. Had the Titanic's structure coped with the impact as engineers were certain it would, the famous tilt into the ocean and rapid submersion would never have happened. Both the rate at which she sank, and as importantly the stability and level of the ship as she went down, would have been far less drastic.Because she was steaming through well-traveled waters, carrying flares and the most advanced distance communication equipment available, it was assumed that a number of other ships would be on the scene quickly after anything went so terribly wrong. In that case, there were more than enough lifeboats to transfer the passengers and crew.Summarily, the principal error in judgment was made when the engineers over-estimated the genius of their design. The rapid decay in the ship's viability was later traced to specific flaws in the compartmentation of its sub-structure. Loss of life was therefore inevitable absent the greater number of lifeboats that their calculations deemed a waste of space.Secondarily, they made the classic engineers' error of assuming that the interaction of human beings is purely mathematical. (Only military engineers are trained to cope with this under the rubric of the "fog of water.") Two series of stumbles resulting from human fallibility occurred that night. As well documented elsewhere, there was substantial confusion within the sea lanes leading to tragedies such as the nearest vessel either misinterpreting or ignoring the distress flares. Even more lives were lost as a result.Second, many life boats were launched hastily, with ample room left for other passengers. In fairness to the crew, which by accounts performed admirably, they had been trained to expect a rapid response from nearby vessels and had been told the ship would take long enough to sink that several trips would be both possible and necessary.Assigning either evil intent or pure stupidity as the cause of any disaster is tempting. It is comforting, in a way, as it removes the cause from the likes of ourselves and suggests such things are rare and avoidable. The truth makes such events even more tragic, yet more readily understandable.


What are the collapsible lifeboats on the Titanic?

Collapsible A had much death all about it. People had their legs in deadly water which was several feet deep. Of the approximately twenty people, at least eight were dead, almost half.


How many life boats were needed to save the people on the Titanic?

Alexander Carlisle proposed 64 lifeboats for the Olympic-Class vessels (including Titanic) which was reduced to 48, then to 32, but only 16 were installed (enough for only 1,178 people if all boats were filled). Thomas Andrews insisted on the extra 4 collapsibles which saved more people, including Bruce Ismay who escaped in collapsible C.it was designed to have 32 life boats but then it was decided to have 20 because 32 life boats took up to much space on the deck.At The Most 40 Life Boats At The Least 38The 20 lifeboats that ended up on board the luxury liner were approximately half the amount required to handle the potential evacuation of the more than 2,000 passengers and crew members onboard. While the managing director of theshipbuilding company, Harland and Wolff, wanted to have 64 lifeboats on board, the justification for omitting them was the concern, expressed by the Titanic's owner, that an excess of lifeboats would have made the ship less visually appealingThe lifeboats comprised 16 wooden lifeboats with a capacity of 65 persons each and 4 collapsible lifeboats with a capacity of 47 persons each.


How did the sinkin of the titanic effect the rest of the world?

not only did the families greive very much, but it changed boat making. they made it more sturdy, they added more lifeboats. the discovery of the titanic also affected the money around the world, and the curiosity of everyone.

Related questions

How much lifeboats succeeded in the launching on the Titanic?

216


Since the RMS Titanic was so grand why did it have only 20 lifeboats?

It only had 20 lifeboats because the ship builders thought it would be "unsinkable" and a waste of deck space. There were supposed to be 64 lifeboats as planned but they believed that it wouldn't sink. It also took a lot of deck space. Also they thought that first class need much more deck space than the other classes.


Why weren't the titanic's lifeboats full?

Because most of the crew members were worried that too much weight would cause the lifeboats to buckle (start going under the water)


Why weren't the life boats full after the titanic sunk?

Even though the lifeboats could fit up to 20 people, they weren't sure of how much weight the lifeboats could handle.


What did the Titanic not have anough of?

The Titanic didn't have enough lifeboats. It had only 20 lifeboats and it was only enough for half of the maximum capacity of passengers and crew, which was 2,435 passengers and 892 crew members. The 20 lifeboats could've only held 1,178 people, but some of the boats were only launched half-full since the crew members thought that too much weight would cause the lifeboats to swamp, or sink


Could more people have been saved on titanic boats?

If there had been more lifeboats aboard the Titanic, then yes more people could have been saved. There was time and capacity to save more lives even with the original amount of lifeboats, but because of the lack obvious signs of damage and danger, many were reluctant to leave the boat to get on the much smaller lifeboats. The lifeboats were designed to hold 40 people, but many were launched only partly full.


How much time did titanic crew members have to get people in lifeboats?

quite long because some people wanted there husbands and rich didnt want to sit with the poor


Did they not put as much people on the life boats because they were in a rush on the Titanic?

The lifeboats were only launched half-full due to the officers being afraid of the weight limit


Why didn't they have more lifeboats on the Titanic?

It was widely believed to be unsinkable. The design and construction were supposedly such that the risk of sinking was considered virtually nil. See the Snopes page linked below.Not only did they not have enough life boats, but they were not filled properly. For example, lifeboat 2 had 28 people when it could hold 65.The life boats were actually designed to be able to be stacked inside of each other, but the people who put them on board thought that the deck would look too cluttered if they put the required number of life boats on board.there was not any space on the titanic to fit all the ship.!!!!Today, it seems baffling that the number of lifeboats on the Titanic met maritime standards. Representations about the Titanic's then-advanced design have been reduced to misleading sound bites and conflated with details of a strangely-prescient 19th century novel about a strikingly similar disaster befalling a purportedly unsinkable ship ("The Titan"). This has led to the meme that because the Titanic was considered "unsinkable," she didn't carry enough lifeboats.The Titanic was actually claimed to be disaster proof rather than unsinkable. The notion was that even if the Titanic sank, it would take so long to do so, and proceed in such a way, no lives would be lost apart from any lost in the initial collision, explosion or other incident leading to the event. Her sister ship, the Olympic, had collided with a Royal Naval warship and made it back to port. (The warship fared far worse.)The reason the Titanic's maiden voyage became a famous disaster nonetheless was because of lethal miscalculations in a literal, mathematical sense. Had the Titanic's structure coped with the impact as engineers were certain it would, the famous tilt into the ocean and rapid submersion would never have happened. Both the rate at which she sank, and as importantly the stability and level of the ship as she went down, would have been far less drastic.Because she was steaming through well-traveled waters, carrying flares and the most advanced distance communication equipment available, it was assumed that a number of other ships would be on the scene quickly after anything went so terribly wrong. In that case, there were more than enough lifeboats to transfer the passengers and crew.Summarily, the principal error in judgment was made when the engineers over-estimated the genius of their design. The rapid decay in the ship's viability was later traced to specific flaws in the compartmentation of its sub-structure. Loss of life was therefore inevitable absent the greater number of lifeboats that their calculations deemed a waste of space.Secondarily, they made the classic engineers' error of assuming that the interaction of human beings is purely mathematical. (Only military engineers are trained to cope with this under the rubric of the "fog of water.") Two series of stumbles resulting from human fallibility occurred that night. As well documented elsewhere, there was substantial confusion within the sea lanes leading to tragedies such as the nearest vessel either misinterpreting or ignoring the distress flares. Even more lives were lost as a result.Second, many life boats were launched hastily, with ample room left for other passengers. In fairness to the crew, which by accounts performed admirably, they had been trained to expect a rapid response from nearby vessels and had been told the ship would take long enough to sink that several trips would be both possible and necessary.Assigning either evil intent or pure stupidity as the cause of any disaster is tempting. It is comforting, in a way, as it removes the cause from the likes of ourselves and suggests such things are rare and avoidable. The truth makes such events even more tragic, yet more readily understandable.


What are the collapsible lifeboats on the Titanic?

Collapsible A had much death all about it. People had their legs in deadly water which was several feet deep. Of the approximately twenty people, at least eight were dead, almost half.


How many life boats were needed to save the people on the Titanic?

Alexander Carlisle proposed 64 lifeboats for the Olympic-Class vessels (including Titanic) which was reduced to 48, then to 32, but only 16 were installed (enough for only 1,178 people if all boats were filled). Thomas Andrews insisted on the extra 4 collapsibles which saved more people, including Bruce Ismay who escaped in collapsible C.it was designed to have 32 life boats but then it was decided to have 20 because 32 life boats took up to much space on the deck.At The Most 40 Life Boats At The Least 38The 20 lifeboats that ended up on board the luxury liner were approximately half the amount required to handle the potential evacuation of the more than 2,000 passengers and crew members onboard. While the managing director of theshipbuilding company, Harland and Wolff, wanted to have 64 lifeboats on board, the justification for omitting them was the concern, expressed by the Titanic's owner, that an excess of lifeboats would have made the ship less visually appealingThe lifeboats comprised 16 wooden lifeboats with a capacity of 65 persons each and 4 collapsible lifeboats with a capacity of 47 persons each.


How did the sinkin of the titanic effect the rest of the world?

not only did the families greive very much, but it changed boat making. they made it more sturdy, they added more lifeboats. the discovery of the titanic also affected the money around the world, and the curiosity of everyone.