The distiction is very valid as it is based upon the tactics used. Prior to 1916 the most supported form of nationalism was constitutional nationalism. Constitutional nationalists were those that did not support the Act of Union (1800) and fought for home rule. But they believed that home rule should be gained through parlimentary procedure and not through the overt use of force. During the time period in question this action was respresented by the Irish Party at Westminster and was led by John Redmond. Of course other well known constitutional nationalists were James O'Connell, Isaac Butts and Charles Stewart Parnell.
Revolutionary politics supported the idea that the British would not respond to constitutional measures and that only the use of force would get them to release their grip on Ireland. This was seen in the actions of groups like The Yound Irelanders, The Irish Citizens Army and of course The Irish Republican Brotherhood (IRB).
There is also the consideration of the philosophy of the organizations. Constitutional nationalist fought for Home rule. This was a separate Irish Parliament still subject to the British crown, whereas the revolutionary nationalists believed that nothing less then complete independence from the crown was acceptable.
It worth noting that the majority of the people of Ireland supported the constitional methods up to 1916. After the Easter Rising and the atrocities committed by the British army, in conjuction with the secret court martials and executions of the leaders of the rising, mass support shifted to the revolutionary nationalists leading to the virtual death of the Irish party and the rise Sinn Fein. However, after the end of the war for independence the majority support shifted back to peaceful measures of gaining more freedom and in the end it was a quiet act of government that separated Eire from the crown (speaking solely for The Republic of Ireland, of course).
Both words connote that someone has influence over others.
They are both in countries
a government, governs a political unit. Politics are a certain view individuals have on different ideas
education is the fore most things. everyone runs after education. where as politics the game of country. and education follow the politics. because the political leaders used the students. they make their min with full of politics views. politics is play by the mind.
France did.
no because it was bot king and god
Politics describes a series of processes associated in the distribution and mechanisms of power in society; political science uses the scientific method to study these processes and mechanisms.
There is no distinction between thakar tribe and thakar caste in maharashtra as per constitutional provisitional of atrticle 342 of india the same view was declared by hon. Supreme court of india in slp petition filed by state of maharashtra in 1999.
Churchill's strategy was not of great tactical and operational genius, but for recognizing the unity of politics, economics and war. As Churchill believed that the distinction between politics and strategy diminishes as the point of view is raised.
no, because the Egyptians developed a political system based on the belief that the pharaoh was both a king and a god.
what is the difference between global politics and international politics
I mean the first political party ever was the federalists but really people started taking sides on these things with the revolutionary war between the loyalists and the patriots.
why is the distinction between insurable and uninsurable risks is significant for the theory of profit
NO
A cell wall is the primary distinction between plant and animal cells.
The major distinction in this system is between consumer and industrial products.
The distinction between the KTSs and PBXs became more blurred as technology brought more intelligence to the KTS