Yes. A dictator is a person who is not properly elected that effectively controls a country by himself. Bashar al-Assad quite nicely fits the definition.
In a dictatorship most decisions are still taken by ordinary people. Even decisions involving the use of large expenditures of resources can still be taken by individuals who have been nominated by the dictator. Furthermore, the dictator is usually influenced in decision making by individuals with whom they are closely associated. However, ultimately decisions about large investments are directions are taken by the dictator.
Yes, there was even a war there.
How do you think on? Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to think off more like?
who can ever really say, its not like we would ever even have a clue if it did really exsist, whos to say it doesn't?
Not really. It is what it purports to be: about Banksy and (even more) about an eccentric friend of his.
Bashar al-Assad was the President of Syria in 2011. He is the son of Hafez al-Assad, who was President of Syria from 1971 - 2000. After Bashar Al-Assad's father's death on 2000 June 10, he became the president one month later on August 17, 2000.
Most Middle Eastern countries are autocracies of some variety, but they do not call themselves "dictatorships" even though they functionally are. You have Republican Dictatorships (Syria, Egypt - prior to 2011, Iraq - prior to 2003), Absolute Monarchies (Saudi Arabia, Oman), and Constitutional Monarchies with Strong Monarchs (Jordan, UAE).
Yes, he is killing a lot of his own people. He tortured little innocent adults and even babies! He is very rich although most of his people are poor, he wants the money all for himself and he even steals money from his own people's jobs!
He is evil if you listen to American MainStream Media who support's an Islamist Government in Syria , No he is not an evil man at all he is making Syria more democratic since the begining of the war there were local elections and pairlament elections and in 2014 there are gone be presidential elections and we might even not see Bashar again if he doesnt win and also what would you do if a islamist rebellion with child soldiers in it tried fighting against you? you would fight back wouldnt you ?
While Trump has offered no real specifics on his plans (quite intentionally since he really has none), he has made it clear that he disagrees with the President's policy of supporting the Free Syrian Army and is more amenable to Russia's view that Assad remain in power. As a result, it is likely that he will allow Bashar al-Assad to remain in power along a deal structure with Russia and he will let the Free Syrian Army get defeated.
Even a dictator can be elected
The term of office for a Roman dictator was supposed to be six months, but it could be renewed if the dictator had not finished his job in that length of time. However it was expected that a dictator would resign the office once he had finished the job even though his sis month term had not expired.
That's a big "if" and a policy position that Trump has not directly addressed. However, the question is more aptly "would President Trump commit more US forces to Syria" to effect a regime change, rather than merely fight ISIL there. Both Trump and candidate Rand Paul seem to agree that unseating Assad at this point would be unwise, given the chaotic situation that already exists in Syria. Russia, which supports Assad, may be willing to commit forces to fight ISIL on Syria's behalf. As it stands, Operation Inherent Resolve will not directly attack troops of the Syrian government while supporting rebel groups against ISIL, assuming no major changes between now and January 20, 2017.
A dictator. An example of a dictator would be Adolf hitler.
The closest thing i can think of is a dictator,czar or maybe even a Caesar
At this moment, don't even think about going to Syria. Wait until Assad falls and a new democratic political order forms.
President Mugabe of Zimbabwe is a dictator. Even though he receives "the votes", this is due more to rigging the elections and suppressing dissent than because the people have actually voted for him.