YES THEY ARE
they are different
on is made for the wii, x-box( i believe) and the ps3
i think cod waw ff is only for ps2 and couple of other ones
but i might be wrong
but so far i like cod waw ff better then the cod world at war
but that is my opinion
No there is not. PS2 does not even have the game Call of Duty World at War. The game Call of Duty World at War Final Fronts is not only different but does not have a zombie Mode or Internet and was created by a different developer than WAW although it was released at the same time. The game had to be designed to meet the limited capabilities of the PS2 just like what is done for the Nintendo games
When fronts meet, the cool air undercuts the warm air and causes the warm air to rise and create tornadoes, associated with rain.
No, The PS2/PSTwo Has More Prossecing Power And Graphics Than PS1/PSOne.
The show has no formal ending. It was cancled. The last episode was not different than any of the others.
Final Fantasy VII is set in a fictional world primarily in the city of Midgar and later expands to other locations. The game does not provide a specific year, as it takes place in a dystopian future where advanced technology coexists with remnants of nature. The timeline is more thematic than chronological, focusing on environmental issues and corporate power rather than a defined historical setting.
Because it is not Call of Duty World at War and is instead Call of Duty World at War Final Fronts a game designed for the older and less capable PS2 system or console than the newer and more advanced Xbox 360 or PS3 consoles
Both games are PS2 games. COD 3 is higher rated at Gamespot for PS2 than COD World at War Final Fronts
Because the PS2 game is not Call of Duty World at War and is Call of Duty World at War Final Fronts a different game designed for the PS2
yes Not hardly the game does not have zombies or online multiplayer. see related link
No they PS2 will not get a version of the game. Call of Duty World at War Final Fronts will be the last Call of Duty series game for the PS2. It was a downgraded version of the WAW game and made by a different developer than WAW's Treyarch
Yes cold fronts move faster than warm fronts
No. The reason for this is because the PS2 cannot hold all that data so Nazi Zombies had to be cut out of it, otherwise no Call Of Duty World At War Final Fronts for PS2 The real reasons are because the Zombie Mode is exclusive to Treyarch and the Call of Duty World at War Final Fronts is a different game than WAW and was not developed by Treyarch. Yes of course the PS2 could not run the program for zombies mode, but they might have run a scaled down one like on Black Ops Nintendo DS.
No there is not. PS2 does not even have the game Call of Duty World at War. The game Call of Duty World at War Final Fronts is not only different but does not have a zombie Mode or Internet and was created by a different developer than WAW although it was released at the same time. The game had to be designed to meet the limited capabilities of the PS2 just like what is done for the Nintendo games
The fact that it was fought on so many fronts by so many different combatants made WW2 more than just a small war.
Both systems are clearly better than PS2 Final Fronts and Nintendo Wii and DS, but there is not agreement on whether the PS3 or Xbox 360 is the best.
No, warm fronts generally move slower than cold fronts.
Warm fronts move quicker than cold fronts but cold fronts still move rapidly.