0
What else can I help you with?
Why the British used indirect rule?
to protect traditional rulers agaist their enemies
What are the features of indirect rule?
1 Traditional ruler 2 customs and tradition 3 respect for traditional ruler 4 cost of administration 5 native court of justice 6 the british official
Did indirect rule represent conflicting ideologies of colonial policies in west Africa?
Indirect rule did not represent conflicting ideologies of colonial policies in west Africa, rather it was a deliberate policy of the colonial office to use the traditional rulers who already controlled the people and the land to fufil and accomplish their objectives. They succeeded with that policy. The Chiefs having lost their absolute power to colonialism, were relieved to have a little bit of power assign to them by the colonial fice, With their own courts, police and prisons, the chiefs during the colonial period consolidated both their own powers and that of the colonial authorities. Nana Baffour Gyanko Fofie I
What type of colonial rule did British have on India?
divide and rule
Is France under the british crown?
No, the British Crown does not rule France.
How did the british rule affect the traditional Indian textile?
cristiano ronaldo
How did colonial rule effect tribal chiefs?
Before the arrival of British in India tribals were ruled by the so called chiefs of the groups of tribals who had control over certain territories and its people. They had their own set of rules, laws and police force to control and protect their people and territories .They collected taxes and enjoyed full freedom to rule. After the British arrived, their powers were clipped and though the tribal chiefs enjoyed the right to rule their people , they had to follow the rules and regulations laid down by the British and had to follow a disciplined governance unlike the lawless governance they use to enjoy before the British came. They also had to pay tribute {taxes} to the British .Thus , the powers of tribal chiefs were highly reduced under the colonial rule - MD.Abrar Shariff
Why the British used indirect rule?
to protect traditional rulers agaist their enemies
What happened to tribal chiefs?
they are more like the president of all the apache tribes.
What are 5 reasons why the British introduced indirect rule in Ghana?
The British introduced indirect rule in Ghana for several reasons: Cost Efficiency: Indirect rule reduced administrative costs by leveraging existing local power structures, allowing British officials to govern through local chiefs rather than establishing a costly colonial bureaucracy. Local Legitimacy: By utilizing traditional leaders, the British aimed to maintain social order and legitimacy, as these leaders were more accepted by the local population than foreign rulers. Stability: Indirect rule helped maintain stability and control in the colony by fostering cooperation with local elites, which minimized resistance to colonial authority. Cultural Integration: This system allowed the British to govern while ostensibly respecting local customs and traditions, which helped mitigate potential backlash against colonial rule. Resource Management: By controlling local chiefs, the British could more effectively manage resources and implement policies that aligned with their economic interests in the colony.
What is the significance of the bond of 1844 to the introduction or consolidation ofbritish colonial rule to the gold coast?
The Bond of 1844 was significant in the consolidation of British colonial rule in the Gold Coast as it established a framework for British governance and legal authority in the region. By requiring local chiefs to adhere to British laws and recognize British courts, the bond effectively integrated traditional leadership into the colonial administration. This agreement marked a shift from informal control to a more structured colonial governance, laying the groundwork for further British expansion and influence in the Gold Coast. Ultimately, it facilitated the establishment of colonial rule by fostering cooperation between local leaders and colonial authorities.
How did the chiefs benefit from the 1900 Buganda agreement?
The 1900 Buganda Agreement significantly strengthened the position of the chiefs in Buganda by formalizing their authority under colonial rule. It granted them control over land and local governance, allowing them to maintain some traditional power while acting as intermediaries for the British. This arrangement helped solidify their status and influence within the community, as they were able to leverage colonial support to reinforce their leadership. Ultimately, the agreement provided the chiefs with a framework to navigate the changing political landscape while preserving their roles.
What did the continetal army help?
it defeated the British army during the revolutionary war, ending british rule in the United States
What economic system does India operate under?
India was based more on a traditional economy before the British came, but after British Rule they have been influenced to become a more mixed economy.
History of caciquism?
In Latin-American and Spanish politics, caciquism is the rule of an area by Indian chiefs or local bosses. These chiefs and bosses are called caciques.
The British policy of did not work among the Igbo because they lived in autonomous villages that lacked a?
The British policy of indirect rule did not work among the Igbo because they lived in autonomous villages that lacked centralized political authority. This made it difficult for the British to establish control through local chiefs or rulers as they did in other regions with more centralized systems of governance.
What are the features of indirect rule?
1 Traditional ruler 2 customs and tradition 3 respect for traditional ruler 4 cost of administration 5 native court of justice 6 the british official
