answersLogoWhite

0

Yes. Galaxy clusters are clusters of galaxies and therefore larger than individual galaxies. Superclusters are clusters of galaxy clusters and so are larger then galaxy clusters. Filaments are collections of superclusters and are the largest known structures in the universe.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Movies & Television

Is Canada bigger or the US?

In terms of Area Canada is larger than the US. Consult any Atlas.


Is plano bigger than little rock?

little rock is bigger little rock is bigger


Are provences bigger than states?

Yes Provinces are bigger than states! The largest province in area is Quebec


How many stars are in outer space and the galaxy?

Astronomers estimate that there is about a centillion (10^303) stars in the observableUniverse. That is to say the portion of the Universe that we can see. More than likely,there are even more than that, but we are still counting.====================================Answer #2:I was in the neighborhood, happened to see Answer #1, and stopped in to say thatI have a problem with that number.-- Estimates of the number of stars in the Milky Way (our galaxy) are in the range of200-400 billion.-- Compared to other galaxies that we can observe, the Milky Way (our galaxy) seemsto be bigger than average, and have more stars than average.-- Estimates of the number of galaxies that we can see range up to maybe 100 billion.Let's generate an unreasonably huge estimate of the total number of stars in the presentlyobservable universe ... one that we can be sure is too big. Let's assume that ...-- The number of stars in the Milky Way (our galaxy) is at the highest end of the estimatedrange ... 400 billion.-- Instead of the Milky Way (our galaxy) being bigger than average, assume that every galaxyhas as many stars as the Milky Way (our galaxy) has ... 400 billion.-- Instead of only maybe 100 billion galaxies, let's assume that there are as many other galaxiesas there are stars in every galaxy ... 400 billion.Then the total number of stars would be (400 billion)2 = only a mere 1.6 x 1023, NOT 10303 .And besides that ... How can Answer #1 start by saying "Astronomers estimate that . . ."and then go on to say "More than likely there are even more than that ..." ? Who says ?Another answer: I more or less agree with the previous answer. The estimateI am familiar with is "about 1022 stars".


Is King Kong bigger than Bigfoot?

Yes, MUCH much bigger.