His mother because she was a hoe
The only major difference between the book and the film is that in the book, Mrs. Coates convinces Travis to shoot Old Yeller shortly after the dog fights the wolf and is exposed to rabies (during the incubation period), whereas in the film, Travis insists on waiting until Old Yeller develops symptoms before killing him. In the book Travis and Yeller had not fully recovered from the wounds they received from the hogs. Mrs. Coates and Bud Searcy's daughter Lisbeth had gone to burn the cow carcass and return being chased by the rabid wolf which is kept at bay by Yeller. Travis shoots the wolf as it is about to kill Yeller but in a cruel twist of fate is then forced to kill Yeller because he has been exposed to rabies will eventually become a deadly threat to the family. There is also the minor difference in that Old Yeller is bob-tailed in the book. Whereas, in the movie, he has a long tail that arches over his back (similar to the tails of Arctic sled dogs). Another major difference is that Old Yeller appears as a Lab/Mastiff mix, while in the book he is implied to be a Black Mouth Cur.
Papa have to leave the fanily because he need monoy!!!
yes that is why it is called a book club
Something that came out of a book. If you need definition of the quote itself, please provide.
It is the summary of the book it analyzes the chapters and informs the reader on what they need to know about the book.
The only major difference between the book and the film is that in the book, Mrs. Coates convinces Travis to shoot Old Yeller shortly after the dog fights the wolf and is exposed to rabies (during the incubation period), whereas in the film, Travis insists on waiting until Old Yeller develops symptoms before killing him. In the book Travis and Yeller had not fully recovered from the wounds they received from the hogs. Mrs. Coates and Bud Searcy's daughter Lisbeth had gone to burn the cow carcass and return being chased by the rabid wolf which is kept at bay by Yeller. Travis shoots the wolf as it is about to kill Yeller but in a cruel twist of fate is then forced to kill Yeller because he has been exposed to rabies will eventually become a deadly threat to the family. There is also the minor difference in that Old Yeller is bob-tailed in the book. Whereas, in the movie, he has a long tail that arches over his back (similar to the tails of Arctic sled dogs). Another major difference is that Old Yeller appears as a Lab/Mastiff mix, while in the book he is implied to be a Black Mouth Cur.
The problem is that Old Yeller has gets bit by a wolf and gets rabies . The solution is they have to kill Old Yeller so nobody in his family gets sick or die from Old Yeller's rabies.
idk this place is called answers.com but it doesnt barely give any answers to ANY! of the questions that i ask i need to know th answer
It is an animal fiction the Boy and Dog variety and is unusual as it has a tragic ending. The Dog ( Old Yeller, from his color scheme, not barking habits!) is deliberately shot as he has become rabid from a bite from a snake ( in some versions it is a wolf) anyhow the dog is shot dead- no possibly (grey) ending of the dog merely, say wondering off in a sort of MIA limbo- the animal is also shot deliberately by the Father figure- or Uncle, in the story. Automatically, this destroys any possibility of continuity ( such as the lengthy Lassie series). I am aware of some other animal tales(about pets, not wild animals, who get into fatal fights all the time) but this one stands out. in the Rambunctious Doberman, the title dog is accidentally killed by an automobile backing out of a driveway, as I recall ( radio drama, not TV) The Ice Pan deals with animal sacrifice by an explorer lost in the arctic ice- he uses the dead dogs to construct a sort of danger flag or banner/ That took place around l908 and was based on an incident in the life of Grenfell, an explorer-doctor. How the dogs were dispatched is not disclosed to the audience. ( I heard two radio dramas based on this incident- my guess he shot them. so it goes support the A.S.P.C.A. no need for this sort of thing.
traves = bias, misfortune (but Travis, as a name, need not change)
No, after To kill a Mockingbird she decided that she did not need to write another book.
dude u need to read the book, alot of things happen to scout in to kill a mockingbird
If you need this question's anwer..... you can find on the book,
The phrase "I would kill for a book of matches" is an extreme exaggeration to express a strong desire or need for something. It suggests that the speaker values the item (in this case, a book of matches) so highly that they would do almost anything to obtain it.
Actually you just need to kill green mushrooms in the henesys hunting grounds
When you are talking about the two Robinsons, Megan and Travis, the s serves to indicate that the noun is plural, therefore it does not need an apostrophe. You would only need an apostrophe to indicate the possessive form of the word, as in, that is Mr. Robinson's car.
No, Emily didn't kill herself, however, in one of her novels she created a clone of herself but they became one person again. You need to read the book to understand it fully. :)