let x= square root 6 + square root 30, I will write S(6) for square root 6, or S(n) for square root n x-S(6)=S(30) now square both sides x^2-2S(6)+6=30 or x^2-24=2S(6) Now square both sides again to get rid of the radical sign x^4-48x+24^2=24 or after we simplify x^4-48x-552=0 Now we know x is a solution of this polynomial because we created the polynomial to make it so! But the rational roots theorem tells us that all the solutions can be written as p/q where p is an integer factor of 552 and q is an integer factor of 1 ( it is 1or -1) So the solution must be a factor of 552 if the solution is rational. ( there are irrational and complex solutions) 2^3x3x23=552 so the only possible rational roots are combinations of these factors, but we know square root of 5 +square root of 30 is <8, we could say <10 and also by approximation. So that means we only have to deal with the factors 2,3,4 and 6 (all the other combinations are >or= 8) But we also know sqrt6+sqrt(30)>2,3 or 4 because sqrt 4+sqrt 4=4 and our sum is greater. So we are left with 6 Well we know our sum can be written as Sqrt(6)[(Sqrt5)+ 1)] which tells us it is not 6. So it is none of the possible rational roots and hence not rational. Lots of ways to do this last part, just show that it can't be any of the rational factors. following the above notation, If S(6) + S(30) were rational, then it's square would be rational as well so we will show that 6 + 2S(180) + 30 is not rational it suffices to show that S(180) is irrational becasue addition is closed in the rational numbers. 180 = 36 times 5 so S(180) = 6S(5). Now we simply need to show that S(5) is irrational. Assume that (a/b)^2 = 5 where a/b is a fraction in Lowest Terms. then a^2 = 5b^2 so a^2 is divisible by 5 which means that a is divisible by 5 (see footnote). for some number k, a=5k. now we have 25k^2=5b^2 dividing through by 5 we see that b is also divisible by five, contradicting the fact that a/b was in lowest terms. Q.E.D. *every integer has a unique prime facotization. If the prime factorization of a is P1 * P2 * P3 * ... * Pn and 5 is not included, then squaring a simply squares all the prime factors, and 5, wich is prime will still not be part of the prime factorization.
Suppose the sqrt(2)/6 is rational. This means that sqrt(2)/6 can be expressed in the form p/q where p and q are co-prime integers.
sqrt(2)/6 = p/q which implies that 2/36 = p^2/q^2 This can be simplified to 18*p^2 = q^2
Now 2 divides the left hand side (LHS) so it must divide the right hand side (RHS).
That is, 2 must divide q^2 and since 2 is a prime, 2 must divide q. That is q = 2*r for some integer r. Then substituting for q gives, 18*p^2 = (2*r)^2 = 4*r^2 Dividing both sides by 2 gives 9*p^2 = 2*r^2.
But now 2 divides the RHS so it must divide the LHS.
That is, 2 must divide 9*p^2 and since 2 is a prime, and 2 does not divide 9, then 2 must divide p. But then we have 2 dividing p as well as q which contradicts the requirement that p and q are co-prime. The contradiction implies that sqrt(2)/6 cannot be rational.
To prove a number ab is rational, you have to find two integers t and n such that t/n = ab.Since we know that a, and b are rational, they can be expressed as follows:a = p1/q1b = p2/q2then ab = p1p2/q1q2Since p1, p2, q1, and q2 are all integers, p1p2 is an integer, and q1q2 is an integer. This gives us the t, and n we are looking for. t = p1p2 and n = q1q2, and ab = t/n, so ab is rational.
The unit of area "one square meter" or "one square foot" is DEFINED as the area of a square with sides of length 1 meter or 1 foot. This works for any unit of distance measurement. So we start with this definition. It follows that a square with sides of length n when n is an integer has area n2 square units because it can be divided into n*n= n2 small squares one unit on a side. For the area of a square with sides of fractional length, we can use a proof that calls upon similar polygons. This proves the area exists, it does NOT prove it is unique. To prove that, assume it is not uniqe and arrive at a contradiction.
You can only "amend" a paternity affidavit if you have a paternity test done to prove or disprove paternity... In many cases this is something that the state will do (ie of child support orders)
Buddhism is non-theistic. The question of god(s) is of no concern as the path to enlightenment is an individual effort. The god(s), if they exist, do not help or hinder. The general thought is that wasting time attempting to prove or disprove the existence of god(s) would distract a person from the proper effort of learning to follow the Eightfold Path.
Prove that if it were true then there must be a contradiction.
2 and 1/2 are rational numbers, but 2^(1/2) is the square root of 2. It is well known that the square root of 2 is not rational.
It is not possible to prove something that is not true. The square of 2 is rational, not irrational.
Disprove.
An experiment can prove or disprove a hypothesis.
By an indirect proof. Assuming the square root is rational, it can be written as a fraction a/b, with integer numerator and denominator (this is basically the definition of "rational"). If you square this, you get a2/b2, which is rational. Hence, the assumption that the square root is rational is false.
your prove or disprove it.
Disprove.
No, and I can prove it: -- The product of two rational numbers is always a rational number. -- If the two numbers happen to be the same number, then it's the square root of their product. -- Remember ... the product of two rational numbers is always a rational number. -- So the square of a rational number is always a rational number. -- So the square root of an irrational number can't be a rational number (because its square would be rational etc.).
A prefix for "prove" is "dis-," so you could have words like "disprove" or "disproven."
The root word for "disprove" is "prove." "Dis" is a prefix added to indicate negation or reversal, changing the meaning to "prove false."
They want to prove or disprove myths.
be testable