I think no cause it's Forced abortions/sterilisation and other human rights abuses
These aren't part of the policy, but a result of some officials taking things into their own hands. The policy just levees fines for additional children and other monetary penalties
yes
It was relaxed because it worked!
stop child labor and educate
Any age you want. Once he/she is dropped, they have to get their own policy or not drive. 18 is suggested, though.
Generally, the father's, but you should work together for what's best for the child. Which policy is the better one for being primary? Besides, with two policies, any bills end up fully covered. See links below for each of you.
i don't think so..
yes! cause As of now, Philippines is experiencing a problem, that is overpopulation. Philippines should adopt this policy to avoid increasing of populationJyes! cause As of now, Philippines is experiencing a problem, that is overpopulation. Philippines should adopt this policy to avoid increasing of populationJ
The One Child Policy was implemented to control the population of China. It is controversial, and has been linked to forced abortions, infanticide of female babies, and the sex imbalance of China's population.
The answer was definitely NO. Several Philippine Constitution provisions will going to violated if such kind of policy will be implemented ( family is autonomous institution, deprivation of liberty and alike just to mention few of the provisions). Most specially the Philippine is a democratic one.we need and must preserve our freedom!
Maybe the population growth will be controlled and the poverty rate is lesser.
In Japan there is not a child limit for parents determining the number of children they're allowed to have. However, there is a government-imposed limit of two children allowed per family currently being used in China. It was used previously in the Vietnam until 2008 and the policy has been discussed in regards to being implemented in the Philippines.
In medical insurance, the policy holder of the policy is not automatically the guarantor of a step child. To become the guarantor of the child a formal adoption should have taken place, or the child can be added to the policy.
i think the future could be that the one child policy could be removed from chia and should be nicer to the girls and everyone should be equal
They should.
The one-child policy, which was implemented in China in 1979, was officially replaced in 2015 with a two-child policy due to demographic concerns, such as an aging population and declining birth rates. In 2021, this was further relaxed to a three-child policy. While these policies may evolve based on social and economic needs, it's unlikely that a strict population control measure like the one-child policy will be reinstated in the future. Changes in demographic trends will likely continue to influence China's family planning policies.
The three-child policy is a family planning initiative implemented by the Chinese government in 2021, allowing couples to have up to three children. This policy was introduced in response to declining birth rates and an aging population, aiming to promote population growth and economic stability. It replaced the previous two-child policy, which itself was a shift from the long-standing one-child policy. The government also introduced measures to support families, such as improved maternity benefits and childcare support, to encourage higher birth rates.
One example of anti-natalist policies implemented by a government to control population growth is China's one-child policy, which restricted most couples to having only one child in order to curb population growth.