Under common law, there is a conclusive presumption of incapacity for a child under the age of seven. This means that children who are younger than seven are deemed incapable of forming binding legal contracts or making certain legal decisions. This presumption is based on the understanding that children at this age lack the necessary maturity and understanding to engage in such matters.
When speaking of paternity of a child, the "presumed" father is the man that is automatically assumed, under the law, to be the father. This definition varies a bit from state to state. Some states do not allow the presumption to be challenged while others do.
It can be and is.
99 of them.
Under limited circumstances. 1 is the LCM of 1 and 1.
The Olive Branch Petition wanted to stay under british laws, and the Common sense wanted full independence.
In California, under some circumstances, 20% is use. The argument can be made in other states under a rebuttable presumption. see links
Even if not specifically addressed under the law, federal law provides for such considerations under a rebuttable presumption.
monthly income exceeds the state's medium income for a family of equivalent size or if the debtor's monthly income less allowable expenses exceeds an amount allowed under the act for a family of equivalent size, then there is a presumption of abuse
Aside from a reduction in income, a rebuttable presumption argument can also be used. see links below
I was unable to hold the rhino beneath the surface of my bathtub long enough to give a conclusive answer.
Yes, under a rebuttable presumption and through a motion to modify will need to be approved by a judge. see link
It's not required under the CS guidelines, but is an option under a Rebuttable Presumption Argument. But, the use of that argument can swing both ways. see links
Generally, a grandmother is under no legal obligation to leave property to a granddaughter. You would need to have specific grounds to contest the will as well as legal standing in your jurisdiction. Grounds include such factors as undue influence, improper execution, mental incapacity, fraud and mistake. You should consult with an attorney who specializes in probate.Generally, a grandmother is under no legal obligation to leave property to a granddaughter. You would need to have specific grounds to contest the will as well as legal standing in your jurisdiction. Grounds include such factors as undue influence, improper execution, mental incapacity, fraud and mistake. You should consult with an attorney who specializes in probate.Generally, a grandmother is under no legal obligation to leave property to a granddaughter. You would need to have specific grounds to contest the will as well as legal standing in your jurisdiction. Grounds include such factors as undue influence, improper execution, mental incapacity, fraud and mistake. You should consult with an attorney who specializes in probate.Generally, a grandmother is under no legal obligation to leave property to a granddaughter. You would need to have specific grounds to contest the will as well as legal standing in your jurisdiction. Grounds include such factors as undue influence, improper execution, mental incapacity, fraud and mistake. You should consult with an attorney who specializes in probate.
what is common assault under west Australian law ? what is common assault under west Australian law ?
An inconclusive audit is one in which the evidence presented is not definite under the specific requirements needed. Information that may be conclusive in other situations can sometimes be inconclusive during an audit.
I could find nothing conclusive as to whether there is a city beneath the airport. You can't put a date on an unknown.
Not yet mandatory, but can still be considered by a judge under a rebuttable presumption. Generally, it's limited to 20%.