no
no - peaceful
yes they were
Mahatma Gandhi played a pivotal role in the freedom struggle of India. His non violent ways and peaceful methods were the foundation for gaining independence from the British. One of the first series of non violent protests nationwide was the non cooperation movement started by Mahatma Gandhi. This movement officially started the Gandhian era in India. In this freedom struggle, the non cooperation movement was basically aimed at making the Indians aware of the fact that the British government can be opposed and if done actively, it will keep a check on them. Thus, educational institutions were boycotted, foreign goods were boycotted, and people let go off their nominated seats in government institutions. Though the movement failed, Indians awakened to the concept of going against the British. Gandhi again took off with another non violent movement known as the civil disobedience movement. This movement was more active than the non cooperation movement and brought about a revolution of sorts. This movement aimed at bringing the British administration to a stop by withdrawing support from everything. There was agitation against land revenue, abolition of salt tax, cutting down military expenditure, levying duty on foreign cloth, etc. A very important movement was that of Salt Satyagraha where Gandhi undertook the Dandi march as a protest against the Salt tax. The Quit India Movement was launched under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi in August 1942. The main aim for launching this movement was to bring the British to negotiate with the Indian leaders. It was a call for immediate independence of India and the slogan of "Do or Die" was adopted for the same. However the leaders were arrested soon after Gandhi's speech and were put in jail by British officials. Gandhi went on a fast for 21 days demanding the release of the leaders despite his failing health. The British had to secure the release of the leaders. After the Quit India Movement the freedom struggle got even more intense and passionate. Entire India was united together in the movement for freedom. Everyone contributed what they could in the freedom struggle. The cry of Purna Swaraj or complete independence was raised. After much sacrifices and efforts, India gained its independence on the 15th August, 1947. On gaining independence on August 15th 1947, Nehru was India's first Prime Minister. However, his joy at gaining independence was overshadowed by the wave of sectarian killing and conflict over Kashmir which continues to this day. In 1962, India was involved in conflict with China over a border dispute. Militarily India was defeated and this took a heavy toll on Nehru. Nehru died in 1964. Two years later his daughter Indira Gandhi took office.In order to gain India's independence Ghandi used hunger strikes, marchs,peaceful gatherings, and civil disobedience.non voliance with braveryAgrah, Satyagrah and Upvaas
Every Cherokee man became a warrior by law and tradition, but they were peaceful to the Americans before the Trail of Tears. So they probably did like fighting in wars, but were probably not bloodthirsty or violent.
India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.
It was made up of both violent and peaceful factions.
Haiti's was a violent slave revolt.
Sometimes as a result of violent revolution and warfare and sometimes after a peaceful plea for independence.
The Mau was a non-violent movement for Samoan independence from colonial rule during the early 1900s
Czech Republic
The fight for independence in African countries was directly inspired by the independence movement in India. However, Africa did not always adopt the non-violent methods used by India.
Through both movements were led by powerful individuals, Ghana’s independence came mostly peaceful while Kenya’s independence followed a violent uprising.
no - peaceful
All wars are violent affairs.
yes they were
Because it would be interesting to find out, for one. Changes have been brought about in recent history by peaceful protests (the Civil Rights movement in the US) as well as by violent protests (Ukraine). You could - among other things - try and find out which kind was used when, and to what effect; whether there were underlying factors that made protests work by being peaceful or violent; and what kind of changes were the subject of violent and peaceful protest respectively. In short, you might learn something yourself.
Why a question of violent. He is always a peaceful God. And infact he is the always the baby God who will have his innocent and impressive behaviour.