They depend on buffalo and horses. They use horses for transportation and they use buffalo for food, cloth shelter and tools.
indians did not go to school back in those days you idiots
That habitat is normally associated with the Sioux, Cheyenne and the Arapahoe. ________________________________________________________ Most, if not all of the plains tribes, including the above and numerous more. They are useful for nomadic tribes, which the plains tribes were. Bri
Usually the markings would be similar to those painted on the body of the horse's rider, and was put on before warfare. War paint supposedly had spiritual significance, and was put on to make the horse run faster or the warrior to be blessed by the Great Spirit. I know that the Plains did this, but I don't know about the Cherokee. I don't even think they had horses.
There is Niagra Falls which is shared by Ontario(Can.) and New York(U.S.), the Rocky Mountains which run from British Columbia(Can.) to New Mexico(U.S.), the great plains, and the Great Lakes.
Not all introduced animals to Australia came in the 1800s, but those that did arrive in the nineteenth century include:camelsfoxesrabbitsdeercane toadswater buffaloEuropean carp
They depend on buffalo and horses. They use horses for transportation and they use buffalo for food, cloth shelter and tools.
They depend on buffalo and horses. They use horses for transportation and they use buffalo for food, cloth shelter and tools.
Plants depend on soil to live and grow, Humans & Animals depend on those plants.
Rivers, animals, Indians, and disease.
The Sun makes plants, which feeds animals. Those animals then are consumed by predators, such as the cougar. Overall, everything depends on the Sun for survival.
If you do it in a forest yes because you will hurt an animal's home. Those animals you might hurt include birds, deer, squirrels, and rabbits. It will probably won't hurt in plains. So the answer is yes in a way.
Well I know that in the subarctic region, its habitat is mainly boreal forest. So think about it, what do you think they made out of those plants and animals?
In my view, the conflict started when the government decided that the Army's role was no longer to enforce the treaty agreements but rather to protect the "settlers" who were violating those agreements.
No, Aztec Indians did not live in teepees. They lived in settled communities with complex stone structures and buildings. Teepees were used by some Native American tribes, particularly those of the Great Plains region.
All living things depend on energy from the sun. Even though animals get their energy from either plants or from animals that eat plants, those plants get their energy from the sun, so it all comes back to the sun.
Well I know that in the subarctic region, its habitat is mainly boreal forest. So think about it, what do you think they made out of those plants and animals?
In most cases, yes. They are instinctively herd-bound animals that depend on and prefer to live with other animals, preferably those of their own kind. However they are adaptable and can live just fine without a herd.