The professions of all 12 jurors is not made clear during the play. Some professions are revealed while the rest of the jurors are symbolized more by their character than what they profess to do for a living. The list as follows (NOTE: the translation of character attributes is in some cases based upon my translation and review of the play):
#1) Foreman of the Jury
#2) <Wish-washy, opinions swayed by others with seemingly no personal basis)
#3) <In denial about his poor relationship with his own son>
#4) Stock broker
#5) <Young man who grew up in the slums, similar environment as the defendant>
#6) House Painter
#7) Salesman
#8) <The 'Shadow of a doubt' juror from the start - the holdout>
#9) <Described as a "mild, gentle old man waiting to die">
#10) <Racist, self-made proclamations supporting this made later in the play>
#11) <European refugee with a heart-felt sense of the American Justice system>
#12) Advertising Executive
In "12 Angry Men," the father was stabbed in the chest. This detail is crucial to the case being deliberated by the jurors, as it raises questions about the nature of the crime and the evidence presented during the trial. The specifics of the stabbing play a significant role in the jurors' discussions and the eventual verdict.
The different characters of 12 Angry men come from various backgrounds, but 11 of the 12 are initially convinced of the accused's guilt. The 12th juror works to set aside each jurors prejudices and fallacies to assure that justice does prevail.
This isn't really explored. 12 Angry Men makes for a better title than 12 Angry People. While making remakes, adding female jurors was explored but dismissed as executives did not want to change the title. Writing in a female might change the group dynamic and require extra work in script writing.
That all other jurors vote for guilty or not guilty, and he will abstain (not vote). If everyone votes guilty, then they will put guilty as their verdict. If not, the jurors will talk about the case more.
Juror #4 (E.G. Marshall). The eye-witness testimony was paramount for him.
In "12 Angry Men," the rain symbolizes the tension and pressure building in the jury room as the jurors deliberate the fate of the defendant. It creates an intense atmosphere that mirrors the internal conflicts and struggles experienced by the jurors.
No, they eventually agree that the boy is innocent.
In "12 Angry Men," the father was stabbed in the chest. This detail is crucial to the case being deliberated by the jurors, as it raises questions about the nature of the crime and the evidence presented during the trial. The specifics of the stabbing play a significant role in the jurors' discussions and the eventual verdict.
In "12 Angry Men," one of the jurors initially holds a stereotype that people from lower socio-economic backgrounds are more likely to be violent and guilty of crime. This stereotype influences his judgment of the defendant in the case.
The different characters of 12 Angry men come from various backgrounds, but 11 of the 12 are initially convinced of the accused's guilt. The 12th juror works to set aside each jurors prejudices and fallacies to assure that justice does prevail.
The rising action in "12 Angry Men" involves the jury's deliberations as they discuss the evidence and testimony presented in a murder trial. Tensions rise as conflicts and disagreements arise between the jurors, ultimately leading to the climax of the play.
This isn't really explored. 12 Angry Men makes for a better title than 12 Angry People. While making remakes, adding female jurors was explored but dismissed as executives did not want to change the title. Writing in a female might change the group dynamic and require extra work in script writing.
The weather in "12 Angry Men" serves as a metaphor for the tension and conflict among the jurors. The claustrophobic heat reflects the pressure and intensity of their deliberations, creating a sense of urgency and heightened emotions. It becomes a symbolic backdrop that mirrors the rising tensions and stakes as they struggle to reach a verdict.
That all other jurors vote for guilty or not guilty, and he will abstain (not vote). If everyone votes guilty, then they will put guilty as their verdict. If not, the jurors will talk about the case more.
Juror #4 (E.G. Marshall). The eye-witness testimony was paramount for him.
12 Angry Men was released on 04/13/1957.
The Production Budget for 12 Angry Men was $340,000.