1) It was not Louis XIV, it was Louis XVI
2) It was not said by him, it was said to him
3) It probably wasn't said at all.
A revolt is a localised violent protest against a government. A revolution is a complete turnaround - of the earth, for example, or of the state of affairs in a country.
The word used in the latter sense was new in the 18th century. Oddly, if this remark was ever made to Louis XVI, it was entirely accurate, since the constitution of France turned through 360 degrees after 1789 and came back, in 1815, to exactly where it started.
Louis XVI (he who was beheaded during the French revolution) had himself very little impact on his country apart from being there when the revolution broke out. Should you mean Louis XIV ( the "Sun King"): he had a big impact on his country in that he made it the most powerful on the European continent, but he did not radically alter its cultural, social or economic orientation, which is something Peter the Great did do.
That depends entirely on what you mean by this, If you mean what counties than the Revolution wasn't meant as a war, per se. They more or less wanted freedom from the monarchy, hence the storming of Versaille and the execution of king Louis and Marie Antoinette. Now, that being said, once Robspiere had a taste of power he did go a little nuts, hence sparking the reign of terror.
he was gelable, kiddish, he would take the last person's opinion, he was really mean and he was not interested in his marriage.
There is no such town as Vercille in France. You might have mean "Versailles", a few kilometers south-west of Paris, and where is located the palace of King Louis the 14th.
St. Louis, the Bishop
King Louis XIV wasn't in the French Revolution, I think you mean King Louis XVI. He was protected by the Swiss Guards.
You probably mean King Louis XVI who was executed during the French Revolution. He was executed on January 21st 1793.
It means the people are angry with the king.
If you mean the Peasants Revolt of 1381, that would be Richard II. He was only a boy at the time.
Louis XIV was not in the French Revolution, since he had died in 1715. I think you mean Louis XVI, his great-grandfather, though he did not act anything.
King George the Third. Assuming you mean the American colonists.
If you mean the king that came before Louis-Philippe, it was Charles X who ruled from 1824-1830.
France had eighteen kings named Louis. Which one do you mean?
Despotism means ruled by a single figure, often a tyrant. Depotistic is a way to describe something of that nature, before the French revolution, King Louis XVI ran a despotistic government. Despotism means ruled by a single figure, often a tyrant. Depotistic is a way to describe something of that nature, before the French revolution, King Louis XVI ran a despotistic government. Despotism means ruled by a single figure, often a tyrant. Depotistic is a way to describe something of that nature, before the French revolution, King Louis XVI ran a despotistic government.
Louis XVI (he who was beheaded during the French revolution) had himself very little impact on his country apart from being there when the revolution broke out. Should you mean Louis XIV ( the "Sun King"): he had a big impact on his country in that he made it the most powerful on the European continent, but he did not radically alter its cultural, social or economic orientation, which is something Peter the Great did do.
In 1887 France wasn't a monarchy anymore, so it didn't have an King and Queen anymore, but a head of state (president). In 1887 that was Jules Grévy, but he was never killed, he died in 1891 of natural causes. Maybe you mean the French King that was killed in 1793 during the Revolution? In that case, the answer is Louis XVI.
Amazing how often this one comes up. Red and blue were the colours of Paris, white that of the old French flag of the Bourbon Kings. Lafayette, of all people, thought up the tricolour to show unity between people and King, in the hope that the King would back the Revolution. In the next phase of the Revolution, the flag came to symbolise the fact thet the King was the captive of Paris. By the time it became clear that Louis XVI was not interested in constitutional monarchy, the tricolour was well established, and was retained even by Napoleon - though not, of course, by Louis XVIII or Charles X. It returned, however, under Louis-Philippe and has remained ever since.