um he favored the rich, not the poor. it wasnt financially equal
The Hammurabi code of law is similar to the ten commandments or most people would say Exodus but the theme was to obey, if not punishment
It concerns all the Empire and all class of persons being rich or poor.
no it depended on your class the rich were favored
Hammurabi made this code so people will be treated the same although it still wasnt. the higher class had more advantages then the lower class.
The Hammurabi's code was not fair to everyone because if you hit a lower class person, you don't have to pay that much when you hit a upper class person. But, it was fair in some ways, that the punishments were so harsh that it would warn people not to do it.
Hammurabi codified the laws in which the state could prosecute on its own behalf. The code of Hammurabi is famous for demanding punishment to fit the crime with different treatment for each social class. The Code is thought to be Sumerian in spirit but with a Babylonian inspired harshness.
Slaveowners, because they were the people who bought slaves and have no ruler over them, except if they have a king that's also cruel to them. They're the most protected and favored by Hammurabi's code of laws.
It concerns all the Empire and all class of persons being rich or poor.
no it depended on your class the rich were favored
No. Protected class people are popularly known as Diversity or multicultural people. American Diversity protected class people include... Afro-American Women Jewish LGBT Hispanic & Latino Asian Disabled Native American Protected class people are historically oppressed by the white supremacist - white-male-gentile-straight-gringo-occidental-ablebodied-settler.
Hammurabi made this code so people will be treated the same although it still wasnt. the higher class had more advantages then the lower class.
The third class. Also known as the "protected people"
The Hammurabi's code was not fair to everyone because if you hit a lower class person, you don't have to pay that much when you hit a upper class person. But, it was fair in some ways, that the punishments were so harsh that it would warn people not to do it.
The Code of Hammurabi was the first code of laws codified and dealing with every class of person including the slaves.
Public, Private and Protected "keywards/ access modifiers" are used similarly as they are with variables. Protected variables, methods or class CAN ONLY be used by an inherited class.
Mrs. Woods favored Mary because she gets some of the best grades in the class.
When you derive a class (the sub-class) from a base class using protected access, all public members of the base class become protected members of the derived class, while protected members of the base class will remain protected. Private members are never inherited so they remain private to the base class. By contrast, if you use public inheritance, the public members of the base class remain public to the derived class, while protected members of the base class remain protected in the derived class. If you use private inheritance, both the public and protected members of the base class become private to the derived class. Note that accessibility cannot be increased, only reduced or left the same. That is, a protected member of a base class cannot be inherited as a public member of a derived class -- it can only be declared private or remain protected. Note also that accessibility is viewed from outside of the derived class. That is, all members of a base class other than the private members are inherited by the derived class and are therefore fully accessible to the derived class. But from outside of the derived class, all base class accessibility is determined by the access specified by the type of inheritance.
In C#, the concept of protected is to be accessible to derived classes.Let's assume that a class can be modified as protected. When you want to subclass from such class, wait, you cannot see that class, because only the derived classes can see it, but the one you want to create is not one of them (yet).... I think this is the reason a class cannot have protected accessibility