Juror #1o agrees with juror #12 and changes his vote to Not Guilty without any hoopla attached. You may have the number wrong for the juror you are attributing the quote to.
The first time it was at the beginning of the play and Juror #8 is the only one to raise his hand to vote "not guilty".The second time it was after they saw the knife and it was a secret ballot. Juror #8 said he was not going to vote and if there were 11 "guilty"s then Juror 8 would change his vote, but Juror 9 voted "not guilty".The third time was after Juror 8 reenacted the old man's walk down the hall and Juror #3's and Juror #8's little tussle. Jurors 2,5,6,11 vote "not guilty".The fourth time was after the knife scene and Juror #7 changes his vote because he was "sick of this whole thing". During this vote Jurors 1 and 12 change to "not guilty".The fifth time wasn't really a formal vote and it was after they demonstrated that the lady couldn't see without her glasses. Juror #8 asks "does anyone think there still is not a reasonable doubt?" and no on said anything except for Juror #3.The end of the play was when Juror #3 changed his vote.So 5 times.
Juror #3
Yes. He was the 6th juror to vote not guilty.
They initially voted guilty because they believed with all of the evidence, that juror #8 was incorrect and that there was too much proof for the19 year old boy to be not guilty.
Juror #1o agrees with juror #12 and changes his vote to Not Guilty without any hoopla attached. You may have the number wrong for the juror you are attributing the quote to.
The first time it was at the beginning of the play and Juror #8 is the only one to raise his hand to vote "not guilty".The second time it was after they saw the knife and it was a secret ballot. Juror #8 said he was not going to vote and if there were 11 "guilty"s then Juror 8 would change his vote, but Juror 9 voted "not guilty".The third time was after Juror 8 reenacted the old man's walk down the hall and Juror #3's and Juror #8's little tussle. Jurors 2,5,6,11 vote "not guilty".The fourth time was after the knife scene and Juror #7 changes his vote because he was "sick of this whole thing". During this vote Jurors 1 and 12 change to "not guilty".The fifth time wasn't really a formal vote and it was after they demonstrated that the lady couldn't see without her glasses. Juror #8 asks "does anyone think there still is not a reasonable doubt?" and no on said anything except for Juror #3.The end of the play was when Juror #3 changed his vote.So 5 times.
The price of an official licensed pog with OJ Simpson on one side that says guilty and the other side says not guilty is more than $50000.
The OJ Simpson pog that says on one side not guilty and on the other side guilty is more than $50000. Where can we sell it ?
The 12th juror in the play 12 Angry Men originally believes that the boy is guilty. He later changes his vote to not guilty following the deliberation.
Juror #3
The climax is when juror #9 explains to the rest that the woman across the street couldn't have seen the crime just casually looking out her window from bed without her glasses. (cuz no one wears their glasses to bed.) Previously, juror #4 said that her testimony was good evidence, but after #9 disproves this, only #3 is left voting guilty. This is the climax because at the beginning of the play, all but one (#8) of the jurors vote guilty. But at this point, all but one vote not guilty (#3).
Juror #3 because he stands with his opinion of "Guilty" the longest.
Yes. He was the 6th juror to vote not guilty.
An attainor is a juror guilty of attaint, the condemning of someone to death and the removal of all their civil rights.
They initially voted guilty because they believed with all of the evidence, that juror #8 was incorrect and that there was too much proof for the19 year old boy to be not guilty.
This because if the vote of guilty or not guilty is tied the one extra juror will be able to decide guilty or not guilty. for example if there are 6, 3 vote guilty 3 dont it tied the extra one would help the tie breaker