Rosencrantz and Guildenstern's deaths were particularly ironic, because they, the betrayers, were betrayed instead. The duo tried to betray their childhood friend, Hamlet, thinking that it would be an easy feat. However, unbeknownst to them, Hamlet had already come up with a plan, rewriting the letter so that they would be killed in his place while he escaped. Thus, they that were willing to sacrifice their friend, were sacrificed in his place. Ironic indeed.
everyone was responsible for their own death...
Laertes didn't have any "important realisations" during his duel with Hamlet. The duel only took place as a means for Claudius to have Hamlet killed, disguised as Laertes' need to seek satisfaction for the deaths of his father and sister. Laertes had forgiven Hamlet, but needed to uphold his reputation and honour, hence the duel.
Whether Hamlet did the right thing is a matter of interpretation. Some argue that his quest for revenge against King Claudius was justified, as Claudius murdered Hamlet's father and usurped the throne. However, Hamlet's indecision and the resulting tragedy lead to the deaths of many innocent characters, suggesting that his actions had far-reaching negative consequences. Ultimately, Hamlet's moral struggle highlights the complexity of justice and revenge, leaving the question open to debate.
Hamlet and Macbeth are the same in the fact that they are both the tragic hero, and there greatest traits lead to there rise and fall. In the end of Macbeth the whole audience can tell the Macbeth has gone mad and will stop at nothing to remain king, showing that he has become a tyrant, althugh everyone is pulling for hamlet he still has turned into a murderous tyrant by the end of the play
Hamlet single handedly kills three people: Polonius (Laertes' father) by accident, Laertes with a poisoned rapier (that was originally Laertes' at the beginning of the duel, they scuffle and accidentally switch rapiers), and the King (his uncle) by forcing him to finish the poisoned wine (the same wine that Hamlet's mother, the queen, accidentally drank. it was originally meant for hamlet to drink). You could say that Hamlet basically killed rosencrantz and guildenstern too. He sent them to England in place of himself, and the letter that Hamlet was supposed to deliver said, "kill the person that delivers this message," so, naturally, the two were killed by authorities in England. Hamlet betrayed them, so he's somewhat responsible for their deaths.
He arranged for their deaths.
he switches the out with letters that arrange for the deaths of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.
The collective deaths of the core cast in the last scene.
Polonius, Ophelia, Gertrude, Hamlet, Claudius, and Laertes.
everyone was responsible for their own death...
Hamlet is directly responsible for the deaths of five people and indirectly for another. The first person to die because of Hamlet's actions is Polonius, who Hamlet stabs in the mistaken belief that he is King Claudius. This indirectly causes Ophelia's death. Hamlet then kills, in succession, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, Laertes and Claudius.
Hamlet asks Laertes for forgiveness as a gesture of remorse and acknowledgment of their shared grief over the deaths of their fathers, Polonius and King Hamlet. During their duel, Hamlet realizes the futility of their rivalry and the tragic consequences of revenge, prompting him to seek reconciliation. This moment underscores Hamlet's growth and recognition of the value of forgiveness amidst their tragic circumstances.
Laertes didn't have any "important realisations" during his duel with Hamlet. The duel only took place as a means for Claudius to have Hamlet killed, disguised as Laertes' need to seek satisfaction for the deaths of his father and sister. Laertes had forgiven Hamlet, but needed to uphold his reputation and honour, hence the duel.
In Act 5 of Shakespeare's "Hamlet," a total of six characters die. These include Hamlet, Laertes, King Claudius, Queen Gertrude, and two other characters: Polonius and Ophelia, who are already dead by this act. The act culminates in a duel that leads to the deaths of Hamlet and Laertes, as well as the poisoning of Claudius and Gertrude.
If we take it that Hamlet killed Polonius believing him to be the king, and therefore as a part of his plot for revenge, then Polonius's death, and indirectly Ophelia's arise from his act of revenge. Claudius of course dies from Hamlet's revenge. Gertrude, Laertes and Hamlet die as a result of Laertes and Claudius's plot. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern die just because Hamlet doesn't much like them.
Whether Hamlet did the right thing is a matter of interpretation. Some argue that his quest for revenge against King Claudius was justified, as Claudius murdered Hamlet's father and usurped the throne. However, Hamlet's indecision and the resulting tragedy lead to the deaths of many innocent characters, suggesting that his actions had far-reaching negative consequences. Ultimately, Hamlet's moral struggle highlights the complexity of justice and revenge, leaving the question open to debate.
Hamlet and Macbeth are the same in the fact that they are both the tragic hero, and there greatest traits lead to there rise and fall. In the end of Macbeth the whole audience can tell the Macbeth has gone mad and will stop at nothing to remain king, showing that he has become a tyrant, althugh everyone is pulling for hamlet he still has turned into a murderous tyrant by the end of the play