King Lear's tragic flaw is his value of appearances and his inability to accept reality. Throughout the play, Lear wishes to be treated like a king, yet he wants no responsibilities for his kingdom. Instead, he splits his kingdom and has his daughters rule over their given region. Likewise, he tests his daughters to see which of them are willing to make the grandest testement of love for him. Although he truly knows Cordelia loves him the most, he disowns her for her lack of an outlandish and public display of love. In both instances, he allows his love of appearances to get in the way of reality.
His obvious mistake is that he decides to divide his kingdom and distribute it to his three daughters. He did not choose the best person to rule. The unnatural distribution of his kingdom caused the trouble in the play. He forced his daughters to proclaim their love and when Cordelia did not respond correctly, King Lear went mad.
He doesnt have a tragic flaw. Read aristotles view of tragedy in "Aristotles poetics" and you can see that there is no such thing as a tragic flaw. It is a simple miss-judgment of the character in which he can change, but may choose not too.
Tragic force is the event/force which starts the falling action in a tragedy. Not to be confused with tragic/fatal flaw.
Macbeth's desire for power.
false
Tragic flaw is a concept derived from Aristotle's poetics which was extremely popular in the 19th century and still has currency among schoolteachers who use older textbooks. The idea is this: Tragedies have to have tragic heroes, main characters who have something bad happen to them. We have to sympathize with the tragic heroes, or otherwise we would conclude that they deserve what they get. But it is unfair to God to say that bad things happen to people because, well, they happen that way. We have to say that bad things happen to people because they have something wrong with them. This need to point a moralistic finger means that although we might think that the tragic hero is mostly good, there is something wrong with him. This "something wrong" is called a "tragic flaw". The need to find these permanent flaws in people's characters has driven students to distraction trying to find some quality in the hero they can deplore and say "There! That's why the bad things happened to him."
His tragic flaw was that he was too religious.
Odysseus' tragic flaw is his pride.
cassius' tragic flaw was jealousy
Hubris - Compare with Nemesis
tragic flaw
According to Aristotle, the tragic flaw, or "hamartia," is a character trait in a tragic hero that leads to their downfall. This flaw is often hubris, or excessive pride, which causes the hero to ignore warnings or make fatal mistakes. Aristotle believed that the audience should feel pity and fear for the hero as they suffer the consequences of their flaw.
Macbeth’s ambition to become king
they both have a tragic hero with a tragic flaw in JC: Brutus; whos tragic flaw is his naivity In TFA: Okonkwo; who tragic flaw is being like his father (being feminine)
Juliet does not have a "tragic flaw". It's a fiction invented by Victorian moralists.
He was not brought down by a tragic flaw, but by honor, not a flaw but a key charactaristic in his admirable personality.
Ambition
it was his jealousy