"Reasonable doubt", as explored in the movie starring Henry Fonda, is the concept that you should not vote guilty if there is "reasonable doubt", no matter how sure others on the jury are.
As to the specific reasonable doubts that came out:
1. The old man downstairs probably could not have got to the door in time to see the defendant.
2. The lady who claimed to have witnessed the murder through the windows of a passing el-train probably could not have - as she wore glasses that she probably wasn't wearing at the time.
3. The murder weapon was more common then the DA had led them to believe.
4. The defendent may have legitimately forgot what movies he had seen that night, due to his emotional distress.
Well, honey, in the movie "12 Angry Men," the boy is initially perceived as guilty by most of the jurors. However, throughout the film, one juror raises doubts about the evidence presented, leading to a not guilty verdict. So technically, the boy was found not guilty by the end of the movie. But hey, watch it for yourself and make up your own mind, darling.
In "Twelve Angry Men," the old man claims it took him 15 seconds to get to the door. This detail is significant as it raises questions about the reliability of his testimony and the timeline of events surrounding the murder case being deliberated. The jurors debate the plausibility of his account, highlighting the themes of reasonable doubt and justice in the film.
In "Twelve Angry Men," if the defendant is proven guilty of the crime he is accused of, he faces a mandatory sentence of death. The stakes are incredibly high, as the jury's decision not only determines his fate but also raises questions about justice, reasonable doubt, and the moral responsibility of each juror. The play emphasizes the gravity of the jury's duty in the legal system.
"Twelve Angry Men" explores themes of justice, prejudice, and moral responsibility. It highlights the importance of reasonable doubt in the judicial process and the impact of personal biases on decision-making. The film also emphasizes the power of dialogue and critical thinking in overcoming conflict, showcasing how one individual's conviction can influence the group dynamic. Ultimately, it underscores the significance of empathy and the moral obligation to seek truth.
Juror #8 (played by Henry Fonda).
The law is accurate in the movie Twelve Angry Men as it relates to finding a Defendant "Guilty beyond reasonable doubt."
Well, honey, in the movie "12 Angry Men," the boy is initially perceived as guilty by most of the jurors. However, throughout the film, one juror raises doubts about the evidence presented, leading to a not guilty verdict. So technically, the boy was found not guilty by the end of the movie. But hey, watch it for yourself and make up your own mind, darling.
The weapon was a knife not the boys. Juror number 8, the protagonist, easily bought a similar knife to the murder weapon and planted a further seed of reasonable doubt.
Answer Daniel Radcliffe has stated that the movie 12 Angry Men is his favorite film
The protagonist in "12 Angry Men" is Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, who is the dissenting juror seeking to convince the others of reasonable doubt. The antagonist could be considered as Juror 3, played by Lee J. Cobb, who at first strongly believes in the defendant's guilt and serves as the main opposing force to Juror 8's arguments.
Sidney Lumet.
In "Twelve Angry Men," the old man claims it took him 15 seconds to get to the door. This detail is significant as it raises questions about the reliability of his testimony and the timeline of events surrounding the murder case being deliberated. The jurors debate the plausibility of his account, highlighting the themes of reasonable doubt and justice in the film.
Henry Fonda
Answer Daniel Radcliffe has stated that the movie 12 Angry Men is his favorite film
In "Twelve Angry Men," if the defendant is proven guilty of the crime he is accused of, he faces a mandatory sentence of death. The stakes are incredibly high, as the jury's decision not only determines his fate but also raises questions about justice, reasonable doubt, and the moral responsibility of each juror. The play emphasizes the gravity of the jury's duty in the legal system.
"Twelve Angry Men" explores themes of justice, prejudice, and moral responsibility. It highlights the importance of reasonable doubt in the judicial process and the impact of personal biases on decision-making. The film also emphasizes the power of dialogue and critical thinking in overcoming conflict, showcasing how one individual's conviction can influence the group dynamic. Ultimately, it underscores the significance of empathy and the moral obligation to seek truth.
Juror #8 (played by Henry Fonda).