terimaa
Yes. Claudius poured ear poison into King Hamlet's ear as he was sleeping in the garden.
According to the report that the Ghost gives Prince Hamlet, Claudius, the king's brother, poured poison in his brother's ear as the king was sleeping in his garden, and then spread the word that King Hamlet was bitten by a snake.
Not lead, but a poison called hebenon, whatever that was supposed to be.
Because Hamlet reenacted in a play his fathers death, which included Claudius because he killed hamlets father by putting poison into Hamlets fathers ear hope this helped
His brother, Claudius, came out into the garden while King Hamlet was sleeping and poured poison into his ear.
Lol... Claudius his brother
It is unlikely that pouring poison into someone's ear would be an effective method of poisoning them. The skin in the ear canal is not very absorbent, so the poison would likely not enter the bloodstream in high enough quantities to cause harm. However, it may cause local irritation or damage to the ear canal.
Yes. Claudius poured ear poison into King Hamlet's ear as he was sleeping in the garden.
No, Claudius did not kill King Hamlet with red wine. In Shakespeare's play "Hamlet," King Hamlet is murdered by Claudius through a more sinister method: he pours poison into King Hamlet's ear while he is sleeping. This act of treachery sets off the events of the play, leading to Hamlet's quest for revenge. Red wine is not involved in the murder.
According to the report that the Ghost gives Prince Hamlet, Claudius, the king's brother, poured poison in his brother's ear as the king was sleeping in his garden, and then spread the word that King Hamlet was bitten by a snake.
Not lead, but a poison called hebenon, whatever that was supposed to be.
Because Hamlet reenacted in a play his fathers death, which included Claudius because he killed hamlets father by putting poison into Hamlets fathers ear hope this helped
His brother, Claudius, came out into the garden while King Hamlet was sleeping and poured poison into his ear.
The ghost says that he is stuck in purgatory because he did not have a chance to confess before he died. It would have been less cruel to have killed him as he stepped out of the confessional, but give Claudius some credit here--he's not going to kill Hamlet in such a way that Claudius was going to get caught. Claudius might have chosen a less nasty poison, one supposes. That would have been less cruel.
Hamlet stabs Claudius with a poisoned sword, but only the tip is poisonous and it is dubious whether Laertes' poisoned tip cuts the king as King Claudius cries out for help claiming he is only hurt. Hamlet then holds him down and forces him to drink the last of the poisoned wine that had been intended for Hamlet, but his mother, the queen, drank it and died. Laertes says the king "is justly served; It is a poison temper'd by himself. [the king]" Implying Laertes' poison didn't kill Claudius, Claudius's poison killed himself, just as Laertes was slain by his own posion from the sword. So, Hamlet kills Claudius by making him drink a cup of poisoned wine that Claudius had intended for Hamlet.
when hamlet saw his father's ghost, the ghost said that hamlet's uncle (which he was king during that time) put poison in hamlet's father's ear while he was sleeping so he could become king. so it was hamlet's uncle
Hamlet dies in Act 5, scene 2 when he is struck by Laertes with a poisoned sword. He and Laertes are dueling and Laertes is using a blade that Hamlet's Uncle Claudius has tainted with a strong poison.