Want this question answered?
no
Authorized shares
The Sun God Shamash!
There are state and federal laws that govern who your personal(including financial) information can be given to. Given that premise, if you can prove that such info. was released to unauthorized sources and you have been harmed by this act. You may very well have the makings of a civil suit. There are a lot of "ifs' to be considered here, however. You might consider talking to an attorney, many offer free consultations.
You need a blockbuster account to rent, or you need to be authorized on someone else's account. If you already have an account or are authorized on someone else's account, you can show photo I.D. if you don't have the card.
Only authorized individuals who have a legitimate need to know or access confidential information should be able to do so. This typically includes employees who are directly involved in the organization's operations or management and have been granted explicit permission to access the information.
Telework is only authorized for unclassified and confidential information.
Confidential by its nature means only a few people are privy to the information, or certain people aren't authorized to gain access to specific information. Confidential information is handled by sharing it with need to know people/personnel only. Providing confidential information to other than those that need to know could cause harm or worse. In other words, confidential information is sensitive, and should be handled with lots of silence stirred-in.
When an envelope is marked, "confidential", we're not authorized to open it; give it directly to the manager.
You are not authorized to know that information You are not authorized to know that information
Financial information for former HSBC employee may be available from any of:from HSBCfrom one of the credit rating companiesfrom the Internal Revenue Service.Of course, such information is confidential and they will not (and are not allowed to) provide such information unless they are authorized to by the former employee as when a credit check is needed or if a criminal investigation is involved.
It would depend on if the person were authorized or not. If the person were not authorized then they'd probably just get sent out. However, if that person saw something confidential then he would probably "fall off of a cliff" as the news would report not revealing his/her name. Though, some people have ended up working for the government for seeing confidential information/projects. Many hackers have ended up working as Cyber Terrorist Trackers or something related where the hackers skill would be put to use.
When people gain access or potential access to such information for purposes that are not authorized, this is known as intentional disclosures.
When people gain access or potential access to such information for purposes that are not authorized, this is known as intentional disclosures.
When people gain access or potential access to such information for purposes that are not authorized, this is known as intentional disclosures.
When people gain access or potential access to such information for purposes that are not authorized, this is known as intentional disclosures.
When people gain access or potential access to such information for purposes that are not authorized, this is known as intentional disclosures.