This is a complicated question, so here's an oversimplified answer.
They are not related.
This has nothing to do with the morals and ethics of art, but graffiti relates more to vandalizing and putting your name out for others to see. Many people tie graffiti and tagging together, while others see the two art forms as distinct- that is another issue entirely.
This is oversimplifying what graffiti is and what graffiti artists stand for, but it can be looked at as a rebellious action. It is an action against authority and a movement of free expression.
Whereas cave paintings are an ancient art form. It was not about rebelling against an establishment. It is thought to be a sacred practice that took place thousands of years ago.
The only similarities they both have is that they are on walls. Other than that NOT THE SAME.
cave paintings
The similarities of an art and nature is they are both beautiful
The humanities are the study of different cultures through what they left behind. This includes their art, literature etc. So, in the most basic sense, much of what we know of ancient civilizations is based mainly on their art, in the forms of pottery, plays, fiction, paintings and even cave drawings. Thus art and the humanities have a direct relationship as one is dependent on the other.
i think what makes it art is in terms of expression. People express themselves in different ways and it takes a true artist to tie all this together. One of my all time favorite street/graffiti artists is Painted self-aggrandizement without permission of the owner of the "canvas".
The painting of Avalokiteshvara Padmapani can be found in Cave 1 of the Ajanta Caves in India. This cave is renowned for its stunning murals and is a significant example of ancient Indian art and Buddhist iconography. The depiction of Padmapani is particularly celebrated for its intricate detail and spiritual significance.
The difference between urban art and graffiti is that urban artists have permission from the owner of the object they are painting on this is legal. Graffiti is illegal because the person doing it does not have permission from the owner.
The eye of the beholder.
The main difference between graffiti and mural art is that graffiti is often done without permission and can be seen as vandalism, while mural art is typically done with permission and is considered a form of public art. Graffiti is usually smaller in scale and can be more abstract, while murals are larger and often depict specific subjects or themes.
graffiti takes its name from Latin *graphīre to write . There are so many forms of it that just saying it is all graffiti is almost the same as saying any form of music is just noise. Is graffiti art? i would argue that by its definition it is. As far as saying one is breaking the law and the other is artwork , i believe that falls upon local laws not in the name itself. All forms of graffiti are forms of expression and that is by definition art . so your answer is no there is no difference between graffiti and graffiti art
graffiti art originated in cave man country [men that smell like poo]
Graffiti is a way of expression. Graffiti is street art made by someone that usually has an Alias fo graffiti and the writer pictures what he wants to express on walls. Prehistoric cave art were pictures of huntings and actions of mankind. Graffiti is much more creative and includes someones personal view of the world, is the key to find respect in people that ignore what people are able to do and create. Not all is fame, is for the satisfaction of the hard work when you see its finished.
Graffiti is art as long as it is done on the artist's own property or on someone's property who has commissioned the artist to paint their graffiti art there.Graffiti is also an art which people enjoys.
If you are thinking as in art aspect, it's just an art. Graffiti is good as what artist + architect do.
Yes, graffiti can be displayed in galleries, especially as part of street art exhibitions or contemporary art shows. These galleries often seek to showcase the artistic merit of graffiti and its cultural significance. Artists may create pieces specifically for gallery settings, blurring the lines between street art and traditional art forms. This practice helps to elevate graffiti as a legitimate form of artistic expression.
It depends on the graffiti. Most tags and profanity is just too boring. Something by Banksey is street art that hits you between the eyes.
art
Yes. Graffiti can be seen as a display of public art though in some instances it is illegal. Banksy is considered a graffiti artist. He creates social commentary while tagging the city. There is a difference though, between gang graffiti and art graffiti. http://www.banksy.co.uk/