If you're referring to the defendant - a juvenile wouldn't be appearing in 'adult' court anyway. That's why they have a juvenile justice system.
In most jurisdiction juveniles are tried in a separate "juvenile court" unless they commit a serious crime that has the court elevate their offender status to that of an 'adult.' Then the juvenile is tried in adult court.
If a juvenile is charged as an adult, the trial will be heard in Superior Court.Added: . . . otherwise most court systems have a separate track for juvenile offenders - Juvenile Court.
They would be charged with assault. There is no difference in the laws for juvenile or adult offenders - - only in how they are treated in court.
Yes, a juvenile can be tried as an adult in federal court under certain circumstances. This typically occurs when the offense is particularly serious, such as violent crimes or certain drug offenses, and if the juvenile is considered to be mature enough to understand the consequences of their actions. The decision is often influenced by factors like the age of the juvenile, the nature of the crime, and prior criminal history. Ultimately, it's up to the court to determine whether to waive juvenile jurisdiction.
A crime is a crime no matter WHAT the age of the person committing it. The only difference between juvenile offenders and adult offenders, is in how they are handled by the court.
The court is attempting to send the juvenile to be tried in adult court
If you're referring to the defendant - a juvenile wouldn't be appearing in 'adult' court anyway. That's why they have a juvenile justice system.
In most jurisdiction juveniles are tried in a separate "juvenile court" unless they commit a serious crime that has the court elevate their offender status to that of an 'adult.' Then the juvenile is tried in adult court.
If a juvenile is charged as an adult, the trial will be heard in Superior Court.Added: . . . otherwise most court systems have a separate track for juvenile offenders - Juvenile Court.
They would be charged with assault. There is no difference in the laws for juvenile or adult offenders - - only in how they are treated in court.
No, at least not in NC. Juvenile court procedures are not public proceedings. Because of the fact that perpetrator is in a fact a juvenile or "child" they are held in private court.
A juvenile court is just like an adult court with a judge, and lawyers. The courtroom is closed to outsiders other than interested parties.
the differnce between a criminal act and a delinquency act in school violance
enhancing the prosecutors's ability to try juveniles in adult court
That you committed the offense with which you were charged. This is dependent upon what you mean by criminal court. If you mean adult court then you're talking about having a juvenile case transferred to adult court. Fr a prosecutor to do this he has to petition to the juvenile judge that this case should be transferred to adult court, either because of the severity of the charges or because of the frequency at which the juvenile continues to commit delinquent acts. For a prosecutor to prosecute the case into juvenile court there must be enough evidence to show probable cause that the juvenile committed a delinquent act (delinquent acts range from crimes - misdemeanors or felonies - to acts that can only be committed by juveniles, such as truancy and runaway behavior.
The difference is the type of case each court has jurisdiction over. The Supreme Court of Texas is the state's highest appellate court for civil and juvenile cases; the Court of Criminal Appeals is the state's highest appellate court for criminal cases.