(1) The existence of unjust laws (such as those enforcing slavery) proves that morality and law are not identical and do not coincide.
(2) The existence of laws that serve to defend basic values--such as laws against murder, rape, malicious defamation of character, fraud, bribery, etc. --prove that the two can work together.
(3) Laws can state what overt offenses count as wrong and therefore punishable. Although law courts do not always ignore a person's intention or state of mind, the law cannot normally govern, at least not in a direct way, what is in your heart (your desires). Because often morality passes judgment on a person's intentions and character, it has a different scope than the law.
(4) Laws govern conduct at least partly through fear of punishment. Morality, when it is internalized, when it has become habit-like or second nature, governs conduct without compulsion. The virtuous person does the appropriate thing because it is the fine or noble thing to do.
(5) Morality can influence the law in the sense that it can provide the reason for making whole groups of immoral actions illegal.
(6) Law can be a public expression of morality which codifies in a public way the basic principles of conduct which a society accepts. In that way it can guide the educators of the next generation by giving them a clear outline of the values society wants taught to its children.
right is a privilege and law refes existence of jurisprudence
As time passes, Morality crumbles into a cesspool of depravity, as evidenced by our craven times ^_^
the output of P controller depends only on the present state of the input, whereas the output of I controller depends on the whole history of the input. that is the fundamental difference between the control law of two controllers.
Liability - is something covered by law. Obligation - is something you're 'expected' to do.
laws reflect ideas about right and wrong but values are the difference between moral and immoral and not everything illegal is immoral.
A minimal requirement for morality.
To what extent morality and criminal law overlap?
moral is something right or wrong morality is how long you live, we are all mortal because we all die someday
What is the difference between "morals" and "morality"? I think these are just two sides of the same moral phenomenon. Morals are the social side and morality is the individual side of the same. Morals mean for me the moral norms and moral principles of the common sense and/or accepted by the members of a social community. Morality means the personal moral values and principles which conduct really my behaviour.
I believe you mean molarity. Molarity is a unit of concentration. So if the number is twice as big...
There is no difference. They are the same.
the difference is this is small and that is big
Crime refers to actions that are against the law and punishable by the legal system, while morality refers to principles of right and wrong behavior, often based on ethical or cultural norms. Not all immoral actions are considered criminal, and not all criminal actions are necessarily immoral.
Yes, morality refers to personal or societal principles of right and wrong, while the law is a system of rules and regulations created and enforced by a government. Morality is subjective and can vary between individuals and cultures, while the law is objective and binding for all members of a society.
Nietzsche described master Morality is some kind of honor, creator of values, art, nobility...while slave Morality is friendship, and compassion. Slave morality speaks against power believes it to a negative. For Nietzsche, master morality is detrimental to freedom.
The fundamental difference between Islamic Law and the Western law is that Islamic Law is given by Almighty God that cannot be changed by the whole humanity. For example: No parliament, no king, no president, in a Muslim State can make a law permitted extra-marital relationships. No power in Islam can permit a man and a woman to live as husband and wife without proper lawful marriage. In Islam the Authority of making law lies with the Creator-Almighty Allah (SWA). But the Western law is made by human beings through the Representatives. It may be based on tradition. It can be changed by the majority. If the parliament of UK passes this law that two men can marry together, it becomes a law. But In Islam it will remain a sin, an unlawful act. Islamic law cannot be changed by majority.
None.