0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did the treatment of women change in the 12 century?
Those accused of crimes began to be tried by Royal Courts. No longer was their guilt or innocence proven through trial by ordeal or combat.
What is the duration of The Ordeal of Dr. Shannon?
The duration of The Ordeal of Dr. Shannon is 3600.0 seconds.
What are the release dates for A Suspended Ordeal - 1914?
A Suspended Ordeal - 1914 was released on: USA: 9 May 1914
What are the release dates for The F.B.I. - 1965 Ordeal - 2.7?
The F.B.I. - 1965 Ordeal - 2.7 was released on: USA: 6 November 1966
What are the release dates for The Ordeal - 1922?
The Ordeal - 1922 was released on: USA: 21 May 1922 France: 4 July 1924
What replaced trial by ordeal and combat?
idono im only 35 years old stop asking mhe these qetions and suck mhe
What are some disadvantages of trial by ordeal?
what is the disadcantages of trial by ordeal
The three methods of determining innocence or guilt in Germanic law were?
oath-swearing trial by ordeal or combat compensation
What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the middle ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages.?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were two methods for deciding the guilt or the innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were the two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early Middle Ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were two methods of deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were two method for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were two methods for deciding the guilt of innocence of accused criminals in the Early method ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What is the difference between trial by ordeal and trial by combat?
A trial by ordeal was a primitive method of determining a person's guilt or innocence by subjecting the accused person to dangerous or painful tests believed to be under divine control; escape was usually taken as a sign of innocence. in England a woman accused of being a witch was tide to a chair which hung over a pond. She was lowered into the pond for a period of time. If she survived the ordeal she was let go. If she drowned it proved her to be a witch and was buried outside of church grounds. Trial by combat was between an opposing enemy. Boxing could be classed as a combat. Anything where fighting took place between opposite forces or individuals.
