The out of wedlock child would need to be included in the will to become an "automatic" heir. It is doubtful he or she would be considered eligible under the state's probate succession laws if the parent in question died intestate. It is possible for the custodial parent to file a lawsuit claim against the estate, but that can be expensive, time consuming and emotionally traumatic. Such cases can become very complexed and unfortunately bring out the worse in the parties involved and usually result in monies being owed rather than gained.
no
yes
No. Access rights are a separate issue, and single fathers have no presumed rights to the child. A motion must be filed to establish those rights.
Yes since he can't do it. see link
As for a child born outside wedlock, the same as any adult, along with no rights. see link below
An adult child is a natural beneficiary to an estate. If there is no will, and there is no spouse, they are likely to get the estate.
Only Arizona has a law granting single fathers any presumed rights to a child born outside wedlock. I teach single fathers how to get their rights. See link below
no
yes
If the child had not been adopted, this would need to be interpreted by a probate judge.
Generally yes, as long as the relationship can be proved. There are some variations in that rule. You should speak to an attorney if you would like to make such a claim.
yes
He has no rights until the child is born even if he can prove it is his.
Yes; however, doing so does not establish paternity.
His rights are to pay child support and petition for visitation.
No. Access rights are a separate issue, and single fathers have no presumed rights to the child. A motion must be filed to establish those rights.
Yes since he can't do it. see link