The question you pose is one of historiography and not necessarily one of history. Opinions differ widely on this subject and it is often understood that there are two main views on the question; of historical personalism (i.e. that history is forged and made by certain well positioned or particularly excellent or unique individuals) or of structuralism (history is made by economic determinants or factors usually evading the comprehension of those caught in the web of social relations which underpin them).
I think neither view is necessarily true, but there is truth in both. Even though people's actions often outrun their thoughts and intentions, if enough people are willing to believe in the beliefs of a single person, then anything is possible.
because it was this girl name maurisa she was a pusy licken bth
In World War 1 Russia and France were allies.
France and Russia became allies in 1892 and that ended again in 1904.
France, England, and Russia were significant European powers in the 19th and early 20th centuries, each with vast empires and influential political systems. France was known for its revolutionary ideals and cultural contributions, while England, as part of the British Empire, held extensive colonies and a dominant naval presence. Russia, with its vast territory and resources, expanded through imperial conquests and was characterized by autocratic rule. Together, these powers played crucial roles in shaping global politics, economics, and conflicts during this period.
Diplomatic Revolution
France and Russia
france and russia
germany,,france,,russia
Britain, France and Russia
A. France, Austria, Prussia, and Russia
A. France, Austria, Prussia, and Russia
France; England; Italy; Japan
1, Soviet Russia 2, France
France, Italy and russia were sided with Great Britain in WW1
A. France, Austria, Prussia, and Russia
A. France, Austria, Prussia, and Russia
They were a communist country and hated Britain & France.