answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The sioux hunted buffalo on horseback.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What statements about the pre-columbian Sioux Indians is not valid?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How can making infercence be helpful?

It can substantiate your statements, if the inference is valid.


Why is obtaining a representative sample important?

Many statistical statements for a population which are based on a sample are not valid if the sample is not representative.


Assume that these two statements are true All Mots are nice Bill is a Mot The statement Bill is Nice is?

It is valid to conclude that Bill is nice since the first statement indicates that all Mots are nice, and Bill is identified as a Mot in the second statement.


Why is Jackson identified with the common man and is it valid to portray Jackson as this man?

the victory of 1836 against the Indians The "REBEL" :)


How do you get audited financial statements for hospital?

If it is a publicly held entity they should post the financial statements on their website or provide a copy if you request one. (They are required to provide them.) If it is a privately held entity then you have to ask very politely and have a valid reason as to why you would need them. (They are NOT required to provide them.)


IS South Africa Provide the on arrival visa to Indians?

As i know, South Africa does not provide visa on Arrival to Indians & Instead to touch the Airport of SA you need to have a valid visa. Otherwise they say you will be fined big and deported back. This is only country that still do not treat Indians at par with World Citizens. When Chinese are given priority why not Indians? Still remembering Gandhi?


What are internal controls in accounting?

Internal controls in accounting are systems set in place to regulate the financial process. This ensures valid financial statements and allows businesses to track progress on their financial goals.


What statements about user accounts are correct?

Every user account has its own directory. Every user on a system has a unique account name. You must have a valid user account to start a UNIX session.


How do you use the ideas of logic with conditional if then statements to verify valid conjectures and refute conjectures?

By creating a strong inference, you can then put your ideas to the test. After close observation, you can then rule-out any incorrect guesses.


What are the three required sets of statements for every function that a programmer writes in C plus plus?

There is no requirement for any statement in a C++ function, let alone three sets of statements. For instance, the following is a perfectly valid function: void foo(){} Clearly this does nothing as it has no statements in the function body, but it is nevertheless a valid function. Perhaps you mean something else by "statements". The only requirement of a function is that it have a return type, a valid name, an argument list and a function body. The return type may be void, of course, and the argument list may be empty, but it must include the ellipses. The function declaration need not include the function body, and the argument list need only specify the type of argument (the argument names are optional and need not match those declared in the actual definition). The function name and the arguments define the function signature (the prototype), thus the three required "components" of a function are the return type, the signature and the function body.


How do you use the ideas of logic with conditional if-then statements to verify valid conjectures and refute invalid conjectures?

By creating a strong inference, you can then put your ideas to the test. After close observation, you can then rule-out any incorrect guesses.


In which of the following scenarios would you need to use a nested IF statement?

You use a nested if when the condition is dependent upon another condition. For example: if (ptr != nullptr) { // ptr is non-null -- test the value it refers to if (ptr* == 0) { // the value pointed to by ptr is zero } else { // the value pointed to by ptr is non-zero } } In this case, the alternative to a nested if creates an inefficiency: if (ptr != nullptr && *ptr == 0 ) { // ptr is valid and refers to the value zero } else if (ptr != nullptr) { // ptr is valid and refers to a non-zero value } In this example, the expression "ptr != nullptr" is evaluated twice when ptr is valid and refers to a non-zero value. The nested if only evaluates this expression one time.