answersLogoWhite

0

In the modern age, where cars and trucks (and airplanes) are ubiquitous and carry practically everything, we tend to forget that this was not always so.

At the start of WW1, the practical Internal Combustion Engine was less than two decades old, and the mass-production of the truck or automobile had just barely begun. Consequently, all the armies on both sides had yet to acquire any significant number of motor vehicles. For the most part, those vehicles which had been purchased were tractors, whose primary use was for towing heavy artillery pieces. So, armies relied on the methods they'd always used to carry their supplies.

As the logistics of any army are a key to its success, huge quantities of ammunition, weapons, food, clothing, and the myriad of other supplies that are required to feed, clothe, and arm soldiers must be transported from the nearest railhead to the fighting front. Donkeys, mules, and horses filled this use, pulling wagons or merely with supplies thrown over their backs. That is, donkeys provided the same service they had to all armies back through antiquity: they were beasts of burden, hauling supplies back and forth behind the lines. Practically everything that the armies needed were hauled by animals for the majority of the war - even when motor vehicles became more available, the horrible ground conditions over much of the battlezones prevented their effective use. So, both sides relied heavily on animals for most of their battlefield logistics needs.

Overall, mules and horses made up the vast majority of animals used - donkeys were less useful, as mules are steadier animals and horses are stronger.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?