answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

the functions and powers of tribalchiefs changed considerably.they lost their administrative power and were forced to follow laws made by British officials.

Some phesants were declared landowners and others tenants, the tenants were to pay rent to the landowner who in turn paid revenue to the state.

British extended their control overall forests and declared some as Reserved for producing timber, which was called forest rules and laws.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Under colonial rule (occupation by immigrants from a different territory) in a place of indigenous people leading a pastoral life, the life of Pastoralist changes dramatically.

The grazing grounds of Pastoralist shrank because of the domination of colonial people to lead a metropolis living, the movements of pastorals gets regulated and the taxes they had to pay because of metropolis ruling increases considerably and imposition of new Legislations.

The livestock and agricultural stock also declines and the trades and crafts are adversely affected as the life style gets modified.

The pastoral class become a neglected class causing severe damage to economy creating disparities among the classes and cultural shocks leading to classes.

As in many other aspects of contemporary concern the foundation of policy and value

orientation that shapes our approach to pastoralism was laid during the years of colonial rule. We

know that the colonial years witnessed fundamental changes in the political and economic system,

affecting a whole range of social and ecological relationships. Although it is usually not

recognized, pastoral habitats were among the major resources and ecosystems which were

marginalized as a consequence of colonial priorities. In order to understand how this happened we

need to look at colonialism's larger ideological complex. It is only by locating pastoralism within

the larger context of what was happening to its resource base that we can begin to appreciate the

power of the processes undermining pastoral practice, as well as the logic that continues to shape

our approach to pastoralism even to this day.

Colonial Sources of Policy Bias:

Among the more lively issues in Indian social history is that concerning the emergence of socalled 'criminal tribes' during the colonial period, captured with drama and brutality in the

practice of 'thugee'. One explanation seems to be that the emergence of groups engaging in crime

was closely related to their economic displacement and social dislocation. It is thought that

colonial policies directly and indirectly created the conditions that promoted these forms of anti-sociality. In contrast to pre-colonial states, colonial relations with local populations and resources

tended to be more sophisticated in its extractive mechanisms. As against primitive forms of

accumulation based on force, colonial systems of extraction were primarily economic. What it did

practically was to exclude populations that could not be incorporated in its economic agenda. Thus

groups engaged in occupations that could not feed into the colonial economy, were increasingly

peripheralized. The Criminalization of groups formed a part of this process, setting into motion a

complex whereby populations were pushed into criminality by the priorities of the colonial

production system, and their lawlessness in turn reinforced the experience of exclusion and

marginality.

by, Thommen Shaji

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

adopted a parliamentary system of government

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

The British ruled through tribal leaders. The existence and structure of the tribal system was preserved and strengthened by this approach.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were the causes and effects of British rule on Indians?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the causes and effects of British rule on Indian nationalism?

British textile mills


Do you think it was easier for rich Indians or poor Indians to live under British rule?

it was easier for rich indians to live under british rule


Why were the Indians were unhappy with the British rule?

Because the British treated the Indians like slaves


Why do you think Indians dissaproved the rule of british in the late nineteeth century?

The Indians disapproved of British rule in the late nineteenth century, as they wanted to be independent.


Was it easier for rich Indians or poor Indians to live under british rule?

poo r


How did the establishment of the British Raj affect Indian society?

Answer this question… It made Indians second-class citizens in their own country.


What were the effects of British rule on Indian tribes?

the British rule affected the tribal life severely. the freedom of the tribal was snatched away by the British. the British imposed taxes on these tribal for more revenue


What methods did Indians under Gandhi to resist British rule?

he used passive resistance


Did Gandhi encourage Indians to stop buying British goods?

Yes, Gandhi did encourage Indians to NOT buy British goods because it was too expensive in the olden days when India was under the British rule.


Why did the Sepoy revolt against Britain?

The foreign rule angered many Indians who wanted independence. The British had not treated the Indians as equals.


In which was did British rule harm indians?

The British colonial rule over India was marked by the looting of natural resources, the mistreatment of the local people and the the collapse of the Indigenous Indian Industries.


What methods did Indians under Gandhi use to resist British rule?

he used passive resistance