when Adam Smith wrote "The Wealth of Nations" over 2 hundred years ago, the south countries were not developed, therefore they were 'poor'. This is not the case today!
countries with poor water example : Africa
Emmitt Smith
Argentina, brasil and Chile are the richest countries in latinamerica
They Help The poor people In different countries
Becuase they can't aford to get expencive health care
According to canon of Adam Smith poor should be taxed less and rich should be taxed more
One of the worlds poorest countries
poor countries in places like south america, africa and asia
The north south devide is a line that seperates the 'rice north' and the 'poor south' The countrys in the poor south are lesser economicly developed countries (LEDC) and the countries in the rich north are the more economicly developed countries (MEDC) hb122.blogspot.com - visit this site for a good picture of the north south devide. Hope I Helped :)
He wrote the famous book, " common sense". and is credited with his famous paraphrase of Adam smith's book " a wealth of nations for those poor, poor Haitians"
Every country that is not rich in oil, is poor in oil! I would say all countries except the middle eastern countries, Ukraine and USA Any country which is a net importer of oil could be said to be poor in oil
Adam Smith believed Mercantilism was destructive to the economy because it drew wealth out of the markets and into the hands of the royalty, who spent it on expensive imports and disallowed a little to trickle down to the poor. He wanted freer market policies that would allow all people to start companies and create prosperity for the world.
because money trees dont refertalize natrally in warmer places.
poor
i think countries become poor because of of bad country leader. this could lead to very high taxes that countries can not pay for, therefore they get poor.
Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.Even the wealthiest countries in the world have poor people, so yes there are some poor children in Italy.
You mean "rich" countries in the North like Greece as opposed to "poor" countries in the south like Saudi Arabia? I think the question is deeply flawed and therefore essentially unanswerable, except perhaps by a flat "no". But even that grants a certain undeserved legitimacy to the question's premise.