The naysayers maintain that it causes earthquakes, and releases so much flammable gas into the water table that tapwater will actually burn, causing health problems.
people who opposed war. people who opposed war. katelyn says: why did u right it twice u re-re
Nelson Mandela was one of the people who opposed segregation in Africa(South).
clear cutting is not important in Canada, it is highly controversial and many people are opposed to it.
Metalic conduit is a metal tube that is used to shield wiring from damage, water contamination, contact with people. As opposed to plastic conduit.
Nelson Mandela and F. W. de Clerk opposed apartheid
The naysayers maintain that it causes earthquakes, and releases so much flammable gas into the water table that tapwater will actually burn, causing health problems.
it is entering some peoples waterways and if it contaminates drinking water it will be bad for people to consume.
Fracking is done all over the world.
No. Fracking can cause earthquakes if the fluid gets into faults. Tornadoes are caused by thunderstorms, which are not affected by fracking in any way.
Water pollution is the major controversy that surrounds fracking.
Yes, fracking can harm the water supply.
Fracking is not energy. It is a method of getting oil out of shale underground.
This type of research requires that cells are taken from an embryo. Some people are opposed to stem cell research because they think it is unethical.
Fracking is a comparatively cheap method for obtaining oil and natural gas.
In the late 1940 Standard Oil began early experiments with Fracking in Oklahoma and Texas.
ye
Well simply it is a new source of oil/gas, that we have plenty of. It will mean that when we run out of oil from traps (the current way to get oil) we will have enough oil and gas to last us another 50 or more years (this is an estimate and to be truthful we still have know idea how much oil is available from fracking). Fracking will open up a load of new jobs. However this will just replace the old jobs of conventional oil/gas extraction. At first fracking will make oil and gas cheaper in the market. This is because if there is more oil there is less demand for it so prices go down. However when oil from fracking runs out, then we will be back at the same step as we are now. Fracking is not as bad as people make it out to be - if it is monitored and regulated. The only problem is who is going to do that, because at the moment it is done by the fracking companies. Do we know if they are telling the truth? For them profit is more important than the environment. However in my opinion I am still against fracking. And it is not water pollution and earthquakes that bother me but the environmental horizon if we choose to take the path of fracking (continuing to do fracking in America or starting to frack in the UK). The oil and gas from fracking is the same as it is from conventional oil extraction methods. I believe that fracking will become another excuse to look away from turning to eco-friendly energy sources. Fracking may become another short term cop-out for the government's energy crisis but in the long term it is just destroying the environment with global warming. Sorry if the last question was off topic but I wanted to give another view to the truth of fracking.