answersLogoWhite

0

Because both are based on strict rules of logical reasoning.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Movies & Television

Is martin Luther king's speech i have a dream inductive or deductive reasoning?

It is both inductive and deductive. There are examples of both in his speech.


What do detectives have in common?

They both seek answers to unanswered questions and both use deductive and inductive reasoning to find those answers.


What is the similarities between inductive and deductive?

Deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is drawn from a set of conclusions that contain no more information than is already available. This conclusion is logically true. . Inductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion is proposed when it contains more information than the observations or experiences on which the conclusion is based. The terms of the conclusion is verifiable only in terms of future experience. For example, there is no certainty that a white crow will be found tomorrow, although past experience will make the occurance unlikely


Difference and similarities between Tylers model of curriculum development and Tabas model of curriculum devlopment?

Both models are used for education purposes, but have different approaches. The Tyler model is scientifically based and asks that teachers develop their own curriculum. The Taba model uses seven distinct steps, and the teachers are supposed to put the steps together for the students.


What is the gcf of 20 and 6514 and 35 18 and 42 24 and 90 51and 27?

20 and 65 is 5 14 and 35 is 7 18 and 42 is 6 24 and 90 is 6 51 and 27 is 3 You do need these in maths, so it is beneficial to learn them. Look for a similarity between both numbers (handiest to spot 2 even numbers for instance)

Related Questions

Is martin Luther king's speech i have a dream inductive or deductive reasoning?

It is both inductive and deductive. There are examples of both in his speech.


How deductive and inductive reasoning are the same?

Deductive and inductive reasoning are both methods of logical thinking used to draw conclusions. They both involve making observations, forming hypotheses, and reaching conclusions based on evidence. However, deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general conclusions.


Why is inductive reasoning stronger than deductive reasoning?

because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas


Inductive and deductive?

Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or examples, while deductive reasoning involves starting with general premises and using them to reach specific conclusions. Inductive reasoning is more probabilistic and involves making educated guesses, while deductive reasoning is more logical and deterministic. Both types of reasoning are used to draw conclusions and make decisions in various fields such as science, mathematics, and philosophy.


What Inductive an deductive meaning?

Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or instances. Deductive reasoning involves deriving specific conclusions from general principles or premises. Both are methods of logical reasoning used to make inferences or predictions.


Chart used to illustrate inductive and deductive reasoning?

A Venn diagram is commonly used to illustrate inductive and deductive reasoning. In this diagram, the circle representing inductive reasoning includes specific observations leading to a general conclusion, while the circle representing deductive reasoning includes a general principle leading to specific conclusions. The overlapping area shows where both types of reasoning can intersect.


Why is inductive and deductive different?

Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or examples, while deductive reasoning starts with general premises to reach a specific conclusion. Inductive reasoning is based on probability and can lead to new insights or theories, whereas deductive reasoning is more focused on validating existing theories or arguments. Both types of reasoning play important roles in research and problem solving.


What type of reasoning was used in the development of evoiutionary theory?

The development of evolutionary theory involved both inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning was used to gather data from observations of natural phenomena, while deductive reasoning was used to derive general principles and hypotheses from this data. This combination of reasoning allowed scientists like Charles Darwin to formulate the theory of evolution.


What do detectives have in common?

They both seek answers to unanswered questions and both use deductive and inductive reasoning to find those answers.


How do inductie and deductive reasoning apply to forming a hypothesis?

Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on observations, leading to the formation of a hypothesis. Deductive reasoning involves starting with a general hypothesis and making specific predictions that can be tested. Both types of reasoning are important in forming and testing hypotheses in scientific research.


What type of reasoning do scientists use when looking at problems?

Scientists use deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning when looking at problems. Deductive reasoning involves making specific conclusions based on general principles or theories. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations or theories based on specific observations or evidence. Both types of reasoning are important in forming hypotheses, making predictions, and drawing conclusions in scientific research.


What the similarities of indutive and deductive argument?

Both inductive and deductive arguments are forms of reasoning used to support conclusions. They both aim to provide evidence or support for a claim. Additionally, both types of arguments can be used to make logical connections between premises and conclusions.