The colonists thought it was not fair if England kept taxing them when they didn't even have a say in Parliament. So I think that it was a meaningful slogan because to this day you can tax someone without a vote or say.
They did not have anyone to speak for them in the British Parliament.
The colonists adopted this slogan because they were being taxed (i.e. Stamp Act, Sugar Act,...) without sufficient representation in Parliament. They used this slogan to protest the taxes--- how could they be taxed with no one to voice their opinions and views in the main government? Hence, no taxation (of colonists) without (proper) representation (in the government).
they did not want them to raise the tax price
i'm pretty sure it was "No Taxation Without Representation."
They used the slogan "No taxation without representation" against the British as they had nobody to represent them in the British Parliament.
taxation without representation??
The Americans felt that Parliament's laws couldn't touch them because they didn't have actual representation. They had virtual representation, meaning that every Parliament member represented the whole empire.
No Taxation without Representation is a slogan on for the Intolerable Acts.
representation
no taxation without representation....
"No Taxation Without Representation!" was the phrase.
Taxation without representation.
the act was taxation without representation
It was because of the unfair taxes and the Massacre which killed 5 colonists.
no taxation, without representation representation
The American colonists started a revolution because of taxation without representation. The American middle class currently needs some relief from taxation.
"no taxation without representation" means that they dont want taxes without somebody to speak for them (the colonists)
The British colonists in America before the War of Independence (no taxation without representation /in the British Parliament/).
"No taxation without representation"
yes... what exactly is the question? Are you asking about taxation without representation?