1. The reason for stripping people of free will is to make (near) total control easier. Rebellion is impossible. 2. The second point is trickier. You say 'controls them without them realizing it'. To some extent, surely, they are aware. They know that they can be observed and they know about the dreaded Ministry of Love and so on ... However, one of the key tricks is to deprive people of knowledge of any real alternative. The wretched world of the novel is the only one that people know. There's no question of travelling to Another Country; there's also no way of travelling into history, into the past. That is why the Party controls all history books and so on. Winston Smith is, for example, unable to find out minor details, such as whether capitalists really did wear top hats or whether it was simply a way of indicating capitalists - what we would now call an icon. One of the key devices for controlling the people in most totalitarian states was to reduce the scope for knowledge of alternatives.
Oceania's government controls its citizens by using thought police and the telescreen to monitor what the citizens do, think, and say. They also use microphones to keep watch of their citizens as well as their own children. The citizen's children act as spies that can monitor them behind closed doors at all times of the day/night.
Also food rations and the fact that they don't eat real food helps to make and keep them weak. The fact that they always drink gin helps to keep them subdued and happy with their lives by taking the edge off. And deprivation from sex helps to take that energy and sexual urge and redirect it towards hatred of enemies and devotion to Big Brother.
Not allowing people to feel happiness or any other emotion besides hate helps keep them in line because they do not know what they are missing out on. By not letting them marry for love discourages loyalties to anyone else but Big Brother because the only person the citizens should be loyal to and love is Big Brother
Having posters of BB all over the place, with the eyes that feel like they are always following you helps to keep everyone in line as well. Also the deletion of words from language helps to restrict the citizen's communication.
'Authoritarian' would refer to a system of government in which an individual or group had absolute control, whereas 'Anarchy' would refer to a lack of government.Authoritarian Anarchy is an oxymoronic government system which could not exist without being completely redefined.
It probably isn't, but they aren't trying. Somalia has been without a government for years. Different parts of the country are under control of different war-lords and factions. The official government, supported by the UN, controls little more than part of the capital. They do not have the power to control the pirates.
Absence of government; the state of society where there is no law or supreme power; a state of lawlessness; political confusion., Hence, confusion or disorder, in general.
To control more territory without going to war - Apex
Both hair and feathers control the flow of heat. Without either, an animal would lose heat much quicker.
It will likely be the groups that already rely heavily upon their government. People who are on welfare or other government assistance. While they may not support the potential control of their everyday lives, it may be easier for them to accept total government control of the economy. There are some groups who already wish for a totalitarian form of government, so they will be happy with it. Those who are disheartened and see no hope without government intervention will also likely by supportive of total government control.
_________ refers to speeding without realizing it.
Not in the United States. However, in some totalitarian countries this may happen. In fact, critics of the government may be imprisoned without a real trial.
how long have you been waiting for a answer
Secularist Government, Also known as Seperation of Church and State.
without a government a country would not be control and managed
Libertarian
the citizens are not supposed to have control over their government because if the government didn't have power over the people, how would the government be making the big economic decisions without the reference of the people?
something
Capitalism allows businesses to operate without regulation, while mercantilism is based on strict government control over economies. [APEX]
vasco de gama
velocitation