Why should minors not be given treatments without presence of a parent or guardian?

Answer 1

It has long been accepted that minors have not had the life experience or mature mindset to really know what they want. (Change their mind, inappropriate treatments etc). An adult LEGAL guardian should be present to ensure that the minor is not subjecting itself to a poor lifetime decision like tattoos nor to be coerced into paying outlandish sums or get poor treatments. This also protects not only the miinor but also the service providoer as the provider cannot then be accused of taking advantage of ther minor. Age ranges of adult/minor is different in various countries.

Answer 2

Their parents know them best and can give you an insight on how the minor works. You shouldn't be involved anyway as this is not your child and you have no idea on how this child works and you will make things worst for the child because you have absolutely no idea on how this child works and can mess this child up even further with your false theories as this is a child and can be easily influenced. The arrogance that comes with putting yourself in a position to call the shots for families when you are not familiar to anything that is going on with this family and you think that you know best when this is not your family is unbelievable. I wish I was in charge.