Actually, Social Services only has jurisdiction if, and only if, a new complaint of abuse or neglect is made. They may investigate only that allegation. They may review past convictions, but since those past convictions rarely have anything to do with new allegation, cannot use this to make determinations regarding minor children.
The fact that a person has been previously convicted is not an indication or determination of "risky behavior" on the part of anyone, especially in the US. Consider for a moment that there are 350 million Americans. Currently there are 2.5 million people incarcerated (these are felony convictions), and this is fully 25% of the total incarcerated population of the world (while the US represents only 5% of the world's population). That 2.5 million represents about 25% of the total number of previously incarcerated Americans, meaning roughly 10 million or so Americans have felony convictions, 1/35th of the US, and this number is rising daily.
The child or children must come under the jurisdiction of a court for the child or children to be removed, and this cannot happen unless the child has been abandoned, abused, or neglected in some way by the previously convicted person or parent, or if the conviction of that person was for some manner of abandonment, abuse, or neglect of the child's or children's siblings.
Check the laws of your state. And, if Child Services does come after you, do what you must to protect your children, but do everything you can to make Child Services pay for everything wrong they do.
no, but she does have a boyfriend. who the hell is ma sister grabby datin?
It is you're choice, depending on how old you are.
Think about it. Do you really feel that would be appropriate? Think about the issue of good values and ethics, and how you would like your children to incorporate them in their lives. I believe the answer is evident, don't you? Viper1
You'd have to contact a Rhode Island Family Law Attorney about that. I'd say if the mother has custody and lives with the children, it's fine -- but I'm not a lawyer.
Boyfriend or husband (unless he is the biological father) has no legal right to the child at all. The mother can try to go for full custody though.
He was still on tour of England when two of his three children died when his house in Tennessee caught fire. He was nowhere near the home and therefore would not be charged with any crimes.
It isn't automatic, but because of your living arrangement and association with a known criminal it certainly could be grounds for filing a motion to re-open the custody arrangement.
Well your gunna have to think, who comes first? Your children or your boyfriend?
Constipation is present in about 80% of children who experience involuntary encopresis.
they act as a boyfriend
The gender of your children is independent of how horny your boyfriend was.
Get rid of him!
no
nope
Of course not. On the other hand, if you're allowing people around the children who are a danger to them (ie boyfriend is a drug user, is a convicted felon, etc) then the ex will have an extremely strong case for custody.
Hans-Joachim Losch has written: '\\' -- subject(s): Blind Children, Catholic institutions, Deaf children, Erziehungsanstalt Heiligenbronn, Eugenics, History, Institutional care, Involuntary sterilization, National socialism, National socialism and medicine, Sterilization, Involuntary
She was born on October 24, 1960 in Quuens Country of New York and died on July 14, 1965 where she was born. She was a murder victim of a very controversial case.Classification: MurdererCharacteristics: ParricideNumber of victims: 2 ?Date of murders: July 14, 1965Date of arrest: September 11, 1967Date of birth: 1939Victims profile: Her children, Eddie Crimmins, Jr., 5, and Alice Marie "Missy" Crimmins, 4Method of murder: StrangulationLocation: New York City, New York, USAStatus: On her first trial in 1968 was charged only with the death of the daughter and was convicted of manslaughter. On appeal this conviction was reversed and a new trial was ordered. On her second trial in 1971 was convicted of murder of her son and manslaughter of her daughter. The Appellate Division then reversed the conviction of murder of the son, and confirmed the manslaughter conviction in May 1975. Released on parole in November 1977