No, scorpions are not decomposers. They are carnivorous arachnids that primarily feed on insects and other small animals, playing a role as predators in their ecosystem. Decomposers, such as fungi and certain bacteria, break down dead organic matter, recycling nutrients back into the environment, whereas scorpions contribute to controlling the population of their prey.
A sunflower is a producer. It is not a decomposer.
Scorpions make good lizard food. There are many predators to scorpions, birds, cats, mice, rats, even humans in certain locations eat scorpions. So lizards eat scorpions, spiders eat scorpions, scorpions eat scorpions and people eat scorpions. I'm sure pocket mice eat scorpions!
No, scorpions are carnivores.
crustacean is not a decomposer
For me it is decomposer for it is just a banana mentioned not the banana tree.
A sunflower is a producer. It is not a decomposer.
No, scorpions are not decomposers; they are carnivorous predators. They primarily feed on insects and other small animals, playing a role in controlling their populations. Decomposers, like fungi and certain bacteria, break down dead organic matter, recycling nutrients back into the ecosystem. Scorpions contribute to the food web as predators rather than as decomposers.
A wallaby is not a decomposer. It is a consumer.
The collective nouns are a bed of scorpions, a colony of scorpions, or a nest of scorpions.
Scorpions make good lizard food. There are many predators to scorpions, birds, cats, mice, rats, even humans in certain locations eat scorpions. So lizards eat scorpions, spiders eat scorpions, scorpions eat scorpions and people eat scorpions. I'm sure pocket mice eat scorpions!
That is the correct spelling of the plural noun "scorpions."
decomposer
It is a decomposer
It is a decomposer
decomposer or consumer (must of it is decomposer)
decomposer or consumer (must of it is decomposer)
decomposer or consumer (must of it is decomposer)