answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Describing a chariot as frugal is an example of personification. Personification is a literary device in which humanistic traits are given to non-living objects.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

paradox

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Describing the chariot that bears the human soul as frugal is an example of paradox epiphany?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Music & Radio

What literary term is used in the song where is the love by black eyed peas?

Paradox


An unproved statement is a paradox b untimely c ambiguous d wrong e hypothetic?

thesis


What is the meaning of 'There is good amongst the worst evil within the best'?

This is a paradox, and it was meant to confuse people for amongst and within have the same meaning, with evil and good being there just to distract you.


Is the sentence 'this statement is false' true or false?

Liar's Paradox:"This statement is false." is known as a liar's paradox. It is an illustration of inherent flaws in logic. Another example of a liar's paradox is: "The next statement is false. The previous statement is true." Why it is a paradoxIt is contradictory. If we say the statement is true, then this statement would have to be false since it was true. If we say it the statement is false, it will make the statement itself true, as that is false.Example in Popular CultureThe liar's paradox can be found in an episode of Star Trek where Captain Kirk defeats a "superior" computer by introducing a logic loop similar to the question's liar paradox. (Kirk: "Everything Mudd says is a lie." Harry Mudd : "I am lying.")LanguageIn semantics there is the issue of truth condition, where the meaning of a sentence is conveyed if the truth conditions for the sentence are understood. A truth condition is what makes for the truth of a statement in an inductive definition of truth. The semantic theory of truth was developed from the work of a Polish logician named Alfred Tarski who attempted to formulate a new theory of truth in order to solve the liars paradox. In doing so, Tarski developed the indefinability theorem, similar to Godel's incompleteness theorem. The Theory that the concept of truth for the sentences of language cannot be consistently defined within that language means that such paradoxes as "This statement is false" do not reveal the truth or falsity of the sentence by the words that have been used.Solution to the paradoxLet us consider "This statement is false." This quotation could also be read as "This, which is a statement, is false," which could by extent be read as "This is a statement and it is false." Let's call this quotation P. The statement that P is a statement will be called Q. If S, then R and S equals R; therefore, if Q, then P equals not-P (since it equals Q and not-P). Since P cannot equal not-P, we know that Q is false. Since Q is false, P is not a statement. Since P says that it is a statement, which is false, P itself is false. Note that being false does not make P a statement; all things that are statements are true or false, but it is not necessarily true that all things that are true or false are statements.In summary: "this statement is false" is false because it says it's a statement but it isn't.


What does the canticle in Simon and Garfunkel Scarborough Fair stand for?

This is a little ambiguous. It implies that canticle is an abbreviation or an acronym, which it isn't. It means hymn or psalm. In terms of what it stands for or means in the song Scarborough Fair/Canticle, Paul Simon reworked his earlier song The Side of a Hill, with new anti-war sentiments. It creates an interesting paradox against a traditional English folk song where a man and woman task each other with the impossible where upon completion they will become lovers again. Love lost and anti-war, poles apart but about loss. There are copyright and arrangement issues but that's for a different question

Related questions

Describing the chariot that bears the human soul frugal is an example of?

paradox


To see the world in a grain of sand is an example of paradox?

Actually, the statement "To see the world in a grain of sand" is not a paradox. It is a line from a poem by William Blake that suggests finding the grand in the small, or seeing the universe reflected in tiny details. A paradox is a self-contradictory statement or situation.


How is Tiresias an example of a paradox?

It is not.


Is to call something Indescribable A paradox?

No, calling something indescribable is not necessarily a paradox. It simply means that there are no words or descriptions that can adequately capture or convey the essence of that thing. A paradox is a statement or situation that appears contradictory or goes against common sense.


An example of paradox?

One classic example of a paradox is the "liar paradox," which revolves around a statement that cannot consistently be true or false. An example would be the statement "This statement is false." If the statement is true, then it must be false, but if it is false, then it must be true, creating a paradoxical situation.


Where can you find an example of a paradox?

Here.


Why is teiresias a paradox?

Tiresias is an example of a paradox because he is a blind prophet therefore it's contradictory


Is time is gold is an example of a paradox?

No, "time is gold" is not a paradox. It is a metaphorical expression meaning time should be valued like gold because it is precious and valuable. A paradox is a statement that appears self-contradictory or illogical but may express a truth.


If a Spelling Bee is coming up so how do you spell the word 'Paradox'?

You have spelled the word correctly: paradox. Example: It is difficult to identify the paradox in a sentence.


Paradox and their example?

A paradox is a statement that seems contradictory or self-defeating but may express a truth. An example of a paradox is the quote "The only constant is change," which highlights the idea that change is inevitable and always present, even though it may seem contradictory at first glance.


Do you ever have an answer?

As an example in self-referential paradox, the answer is NO!


How does the US resolve the paradox on democracy?

It doesn't. In fact, the US is a prime example of the paradox's main idea.