The TOTAL and ENTIRE docket of all US bankruptcy actions ever undertaken undoubtedly contains SOME accusations of this or similar nature. You are asking for information beyond the scope of this site to conduct that kind of research on your behalf.
No, they go free as far as i know.
When someone is referred to as a party to a lawsuit it means they are a litigant, either plaintiff or defendant.
No. That was another actor, who has also worked as a Stunt double
The form is a summons to appear before the local California court as a defendant. The only documentation required is the actual summons.
That is the standard which must be met for conviction of a defendant in a criminal trial. Notice that the standard is not, "beyond ALL doubt," - only beyond REASONABLE doubt.REASONABLE DOUBT - The level of certainty a juror must have to find a defendant guilty of a crime. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. However, it does not mean beyond ALL doubt.See below link:
A defendant does not have the right to an attorney in a legal proceeding if they can afford to hire one themselves and choose not to do so.
Yes. Perjury occurs anytime you're under oath and lie.
arraingnment
No, the respondant/defendant is granted the opportunity to either be present or represented.
In civil law, the party who is served with the papers beginning the civil action, and is defending the lawsuit is called the "defendant"; the party who brings the lawsuit is called the "plaintiff". In the strictest sense, the person in a criminal 'lawsuit' not a civil proceeding, is called a "defendant". The party, in the criminal action, who brings the lawsuit, a criminal proceeding, is called the "State". The representative for the criminal action against the is a Prosecutor. Please see the discussion page for further notions about using the word "defendant" instead of the label "accused" in a criminal proceeding.
if you waive your rights for an attorney, but i dont recommend doing so...
No, a respondent is not considered a defendant in a legal case. In legal terms, a respondent is typically a party who responds to a petition or complaint filed by another party, while a defendant is the party being accused or sued in a legal proceeding.
If the defendant declared bankruptcy, you may need to file a claim with the bankruptcy court to try and recover the debt owed to you. However, your ability to collect on the judgment may be limited depending on the type of bankruptcy and the specific circumstances of the case. It's advisable to seek legal counsel to understand your options and rights in this situation.
An Ex Parte hearing is a judicial hearing without one of the opposing parties being present."Disposed proceeding as exparte" means that a hearing was held to give the opportunity to the defendant to attend but the defendant did not attend. Therefore, the proceeding can continue "ex parte."
An acceleration hearing is a court proceeding where a judge decides if a defendant has violated their probation or parole conditions. This hearing is scheduled to occur before the defendant's regular court date to address any alleged violations promptly.
That is the defendant's dilemma. You must counter the prosecutions charge and convince the court (or a jury) that your actions WERE justified.
If your defendant file bankruptcy and is successful, then you can not collect. Sorry. You went to all that inconvenience for nothing. The only exception is if there was a willful fraud committed by the debtor or they incurred a debt by driving under the influence, or child support and possibly (now) alimony.