Yes, because I would have to swear on a Bible to tell the truth and when asked if I believe God is who He says He is and Christ is who He says He is, I'd have to tell the truth. I would, in essence, convict myself.
No, the offense is not enough to go through the expense of a warrant that has interstate transportation costs related to rendition.
No. Here's why:All F*cked UpThis is NOT a Christian title. I am all f*cked up are NOT Christian lyrics. And it's not talking about being lost without Jesus then turning into Him, no this is NOT a Christian song. A Beautiful LifeWow. THATS the kind of Christian title's there are. Let me check the lyrics... Boy was I wrong! I say I love you but I really don't know you is lying and not Christian lyrics.BlackjackHmmm, are these any better? No. They aren't/Okay. I know enough to say Everclear is NOT a Christian band.
Yes. Relient K is a popular Christian rock band.Their songs have been on WOW Hits many times before, they play on Christian radio stations, and their lyrics are awesome.Yes. Proofs of this are in Softer to me, I so hate consequences, and those words are not enough. Along with others.
Skillet is a Christian rock band because: a) They have lyrics with powerful meanings and they praise Jesus b) They're all Christians c) They don't cuss or talk about inappropriate stuff. Just truth d) Their songs play on Christian radio stations
yes Vince GIll is Christian According to his conversation with Sting, where he said as long as one is a decent, good person, they're fine, I would say no, he's not a Christian. Or he THINKS he is, as many people do, but has not actually been born again. A born again person knows that no one is good, or decent "enough". By his own words I woud say he is NOT a true Christian.
The evidence may not be sufficient to convict the suspect in the case.
The police arrested suspects, but they did not have any hard evidence.
Because the police have enough evidence to charge him with a crime.
You and your attorney will have to produce enough evidence to counter the prosecutors evidence that it WAS you.
Becase all evidence must be factual, proveable, and able to be examined by the defense.
YesAnother View: No, not directly. "Word of mouth" may be enough to bring drug trafficking to the attention of law enforcement, or lead their investigtion in the right direction, but the evidence that is collected and used to convict the defendant(s) must be collected in accordance with the law and the rules of evidence.
No, it's not enough evidence to convict someone. You know that they were there, and you can definitely consider them a suspect, but you can't make a definite conviction.
That is up to the police.
A confession alone is not always enough to convict someone of a crime. Other evidence, such as physical evidence or witness testimony, is typically needed to corroborate the confession and prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Confessions can be challenged in court if they are obtained improperly or under duress.
If they amounted to criminal offenses, yes you can, if it is determined that it was you who committed them. Whatever you are referring to, most (all?) states have statutes of limitations on certain crimes but they usually take several years to pass before the opportunity for prosecution lapses. It also depends on what kind of "actions" you are talking about. If it was doing drugs, then no, there is no evidence to convict you. If you were stealing, then yes, if there is evidence to prove that you were the culprit, then you can be arrested and convicted for it if the evidence is strong enough.
Individuals are arrested based on the existence of probable cause. If there is enough evidence to show probable cause, the individual will be arrested by the police and taken to jail.
The police arrest people when they have some evidence of illegal activity. Your sister's believing that you have taken money is not enough for an arrest, but if she can provide evidence or proof that you did that, you may well be arrested.