Is it better to be circumsized?

Answer 1

I am not circumcised. that is to say my genitalia is totally intact. I have never had any problem pulling back my foreskin in the shower or bath and simply giving it a rinse or a wash. The foreskin protects my glans from being constantly rubbed on my underwear which will eventually lead to it becoming desensitised and drying out. Not only that but if I were circumcised I would be missing over 20.000 of the pleasure giving nerves that live in the foreskin. as for uncontrollable boners, people that are intact tend to have far better control over their penis not to mention that it feels better to the woman. Masturbation is also far more pleasurable with the intact penis. Circumcision is a religious rite there is no evidence that there is any advantage in being mutilated in this way.

I am Circumcised and i can say it gets rid of the hassle of cleaning under the foreskin + you get to run around naked for 2 weeks every body wins the only problem is the uncontrollable boners

Answer 2

not at all, That is the natural way to be and more then 80% of the worlds men are not circumcised and look upon the practice with disgust and scorn. imagine cuting a definitely useful part of your penis of to satisfy some perverted religious requirement, it is litle wonder that is is done to children thathat have no control over it beng done. because it is a gory and painful business. I'm uncircumcised, all you need is confidence, its the key to success in life.

Having a penis that is intact is in fac very good, circumcision is a damaging religious rite that has no advantage from the point of health or hygiene. It is no more then male genital mutilation.