no
Published in 1835, "The Alphabet Song" itself is in the public domain; certain arrangements, performances, or recordings may have their own rights.
The song itself is in the public domain, but certain arrangements, settings, performances, and recordings may have their own protection.
chances are if it's on a cd, cassette tape or record... yes it is copyright protected! The song itself is controlled by Carl Perkins Music and Wren Music (a division of Cherio); certain performances and recordings may have additional protections.
Yes a crow can remember faces or a face. New studies have shown that the crow is one of the most intelligent animals in the world. Crows have the ability to remember and pick out certain faces in a crowd.
By a certain one named Atachocam
According to YouTube policies, "A copyright strike may expire in 6 months, subject to certain conditions, as long as no additional copyright notifications are received during that time."
In the Simpsons Movie nowhere in the movie stated that they lived in any certain area of Alaska.
According to the Copyright Office, "To be protected by copyright, a work must contain a certain minimum amount of authorship in the form of original literary, musical, pictorial, or graphic expression." It would be difficult to assert that the palette embodied such authorship.Colors can be registered as part of a trademark.
For the rightsholder, copyright allows an income to be derived from the book and its content. For a user, copyright law allows certain unlicensed uses such as in education or criticism.
No, but certain brands may have trademarks for it.
Certain things on the Internet are copyright. This is because it is someone work/ creation and is therefore illegal to use this persons work with out acknowledgement of the creator. Anything which says copyright ( such as artists songs) are copyright.
Using materials that are your own original work, are in the public domain, or for which you have a license would not be infringing. The law also allows limited unlicensed uses for education and critique, certain duplication by libraries and archives, and certain uses by the federal government. In fact, the vast majority of US copyright law is made up of limitations, defenses, and exceptions to the exclusive rights of the copyright holder.
Altering, copying, distributing, or in certain cases displaying a work without permission of the copyright holder is an infringement of his or her copyright.
The legal term (and concept) is "copyright infringement". This is more accurate, as "violation" is more properly a term for criminal activities, not civil actions, and copyright law is Civil Law (though, unfortunately, there now also exists certain Criminal Laws for certain copyright infringement situations). Specifically, copyright infringement is the copying (in whole or in part) of a copyrighted work without the express consent of the copyright owner of that work. There are specific exceptions to where certain amounts of copying are legal (most prominently, but not exclusively, the "Fair Use" doctrine).
They're not the same. Copyright is the ability of the owner of the rights in a work to prohibit certain uses of a work. Fair use is the ability of someone to legally use a copyrighted work for certain limited purposes without permission of the copyright owner.
No. Common words/phrases, titles & names cannot be copyright protected. Under certain circumstances they can, however, be trademarked
The only way to be certain is to contact the copyright holder yourself.