That's really a matter of opinion, rather than a straight answer.
I believe it should not be banned.
We can learn a lot from the inside of a frog.
As long as animals are treated humanely, and dissection is done only by students at an appropriate level and track of study, then there is no question that dissection should continue.
Heres Why:
1.virtual dissection doesnt have the full reality
2.real dissection gives hands-on experience
3.gives experience for students following the medical field
4.cheaper:dont have to upgrade on new technology for virtual dissection
Other opinion: I believe that Dissections should be banned and that if people want to dissect something, that they should have a course specifically for the people who want to see or smell the nasty guts of a frog or the nastiness of a worm or the eggs in a grasshopper.
It depends what you mean by dissection. Getting hearts, eyes and dead animals from slaughter houses is no different that cutting up meat for dinner. Trapping kittens or capturing senior citizens for vivisection is another.Learning that any meat product is the result of an animal dining is a valuable lesson. In today's urban environment may believe that steaks are grown in cello wrapped packages on a farm. This is a useful piece of knowledge.
Because the word "Homework" is work that is to be done at home, whilst the teacher can start to teach you another part of the subject, some teachers believe that you work better in a much relaxed environment, so homework you can take your time and not have to rush or work in a rushed environment. and it should be banned in schools, because you could be doing it in another lesson, when you should be concentrating on the lesson you are in.
Because , they think its not healthy and such ban Soda in school but my school has Snapple which has 40Grams of sugar and they approve it. Pretty pointless.
ray ban p? did u mean philippines, sometimes not real real us real and not real
There are no actual totals of the schools that have banned 'Catcher in the Rye,' over the years, because those who ban, and later decide to allow the book, or the reverse, are constantly changing. However, it is among a cadre of books that share the distinction of being the most banned of all time. Reasons for banning ranged from obscenity, and inappropriate language to being 'biased against white people.'
8
todds
It is debatable
no they shouldnt bc in schools their lunches can be expired
Well, I can't really answer this questions and stating it as a fact because it requires an opinion of someone. But, if it were me making the decision, I would not ban the dissection of animals because it teaches students about the animal body and acquires useful information. But, circumstances would apply. I would not allow animals close to extinction be dissected and no big animals, such as dogs or wolves or bears or animals in that size and up. I would allow animals such as the original frog, worms, fish, cow brains (cows that have already died of old age or of disease.) pig brains, hearts, mice, birds, etc. Dissection of animals is also necessary because let's say if a sickness was going around and it was only occurring in animals, you would need to dissect the animal to get the information you need to stop it from getting into a human. So when you really look at it, dissection is necessary. :) But again, this is just my opinion. :) -MooMay17
Elementary schools should not ban recess. Children need time to take a break from being in the classroon all day, and they also need the exercise.
Schools in L.A. will ban chocolate milk from students so that proves that schools can ban chocolate milk from students!
No you sould not have to go school the goverment should ban schools and burn them all down
gree
no, because you need to stay hydrated during the day.
No, because a hairstyle is a sense of individuality. I mean would you like it if someone banned you favourite hairstyle?
For schools, yes. Kids are breaking them and playing with them during class. Plus , kids are stealing them from each other.
Yes.