Sony
first string are the better players they start, second string backs them up.
STG
EMI studio
His first position with the company was as an industrial engineer in 1969
The first commercial electric guitar began production in 1932 by the Ro-Pat-In Corporation. The company was renamed the Rickenbacker Electro Stringed Instrument Company in 1934.
akhito
prince shotoku
The first company to sell CD players was Sony. The first product was launched in Japan in 1982. The first CD player sold by Sony was called the Sony CDP-101.
the japans were the first to invent the first solar car
1947 at Bell Labs. It was a germanium point contact transistor.
The third, if the first two are won by different players, also if the players are evenly matched.
Battle of Midway.
1947
aliens from the Roswell crash
he invented the first transistor
The transistor was created by researchers at the university of Geneva. "The first patent for a field-effect transistor principle was filed in Canada... 1925. In 1934 German physicist Dr. Oskar Heil patented another field-effect transistor."
depends on the contract. if they do "Have to" supply the company then the damages awarded by a judge would be great. read the contract though, it may not spell this out. if they "Don't have to" supply the company, then, the owner operator of the pacemaker company shouldn't have left him\herself do dependant on one individual component supplier. they should have left themselves an option. It wouldn't be illegal as in 'call the cops and throw him in jail', but they could be held liable for damages in civil court IF they are in violation of a legally binding contract. Here's the flipside of this question: WHY is the transistor company considering cutting off the supply to the pacemaker company? I can think of two reasons--that the transistor company for some reason no longer has anything to sell to the pacemaker company, or the pacemaker company for some reason gave the transistor company grounds to drop them. The first scenario: The transistor company quit making the part number the pacemaker company buys. In this case, most vendors will assist their customers in transitioning to a different part. If the pacemaker company for whatever reason refuses to change, the transistor company can cite that as a reason to drop the customer. The second scenario: The pacemaker company quit paying invoices. I have seen a lot of contracts; I have never seen one that doesn't state payment terms in clear language.