In practice, the controller output is limited, either by its own limitations or by the limitations of the corresponding actuator. Let umax and umin denote the minimum and maximum output of the controller. The proportional band of the controller is then defined as:
In the ideal case, a controller can have an unlimited output. The proportional band (PB) is then defined as:
This definition of proportional band is often used instead of the controller gain. The value is expressed in percent (%).
No. They are not a Christian band.
no he is legend is not a christian band. the band members may be christian but the band itself is not
In telecommunications, the terms multi-band, dual-band, tri-band, quad-band and penta-band refer to a device (especially a mobile phone)
No. They're a rock band.
Although all the band members are Christian, the band Blur is not a Christian band.
Yes, the elastic property of a rubber band is a good example of Hooke's law because it demonstrates proportional behavior between the force applied and the resulting deformation. Hooke's Law states that the force needed to extend or compress a spring or elastic material by a certain distance is directly proportional to that distance.
it is range of frequency variation for which governor does not take any proportional corrective action.
Proportional is when it is proportional.
The force could be in Newtons or poundsforce. It will be proportional to the amount of stretch, up to the limit of elasticity.
A is proportional to C4.
It is an expression, not an equation and so cannot be proportional nor non-proportional.
Directly proportional relationship is F=ma, F is directly proportional to a. Inversely proportional relationship is v=r/t, v is inversely proportional to t.
Yes. When you stretch a rubber band you are "giving" it mechanical energy, like a rechargeable battery is given electricity. The more you stretch the rubber band the more mechanical energy you are storing in it.
The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
Directly proportional. Greater speed - greater distance.
Disproportional.If instead you're looking for the antonym of directly proportional, that would be inversely proportional.
Your question is incomplete... proportional to WHAT?