I can think of two big reasons right off the top of the bat:
1). Radio signals are influenced by a trip through the atmosphere much less than
optical ones are, so the downside of observing them from the surface is far less.
2). Radio telescopes operate at wavelengths that are perhaps 15,000 times the
wavelengths at which optical instruments do. So for comparable sensitivity and
resolution, a radio telescope has to be 15,000 times the size of an optical one.
Armed with this fact, your average Congressperson is not likely to support the
program to fund a proposed Jansky Space Radio Telescope.
so people could give it instead of trading something the same value but you have to earn it.
if it says pregnate it could be a false positive meaning you could have cancer instead
a little yellow
It is not for them or agansed them they could be shopping for girls clothes instead so it would be better for them to go to new look i don't care, but the fitty on the bags are all i care about.
Well, I could list 100 stores but instead... Go to this website, see related links then go to MALL DIRECTORY and there is a list of the stores. Hope this helps :)
To make a tv telescope
you can see heavenly bodies with the help of a telescope
Yes, you could use a telescope to find a UFO.
Copernicus did not use a telescope in his astronomical work.
Histology technician training is when you prepare tissue samples for pathologists to analyse. This could include placing tissue from a human body, plants and animals under a telescope. The work also involves dehydrating and freezing the tissue.
You coulD explore shizzle
Histology technician training is when you prepare tissue samples for pathologists to analyse. This could include placing tissue from a human body, plants and animals under a telescope. The work also involves dehydrating and freezing the tissue.
If the telescope were placed in space (like hubble) the images would be greatly improved due to the lack of both atmosphere and ambient light, such as streetlights. The lack of atmosphere means that the light from distant objects need not travel through turbulent gases found in the atmosphere. this would eliminate the 'twinkling' of stars, and the lack of ambient light would result in much greater detail in the image.
If the telescope were placed in space (like hubble) the images would be greatly improved due to the lack of both atmosphere and ambient light, such as streetlights. The lack of atmosphere means that the light from distant objects need not travel through turbulent gases found in the atmosphere. this would eliminate the 'twinkling' of stars, and the lack of ambient light would result in much greater detail in the image.
You could make the telescope able to see better in the dark and make it more portable.
yes
You can't