answersLogoWhite

0

After a certain number of half-lives elapses, the remaining amount of carbon-14 is too low to measure with precision. Also, the risk of contamination becomes much greater; i.e., a small contamination will have a larger effect.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What Limitations are there of using carbon14 to date rocks?

The main limitations of using Carbon14 dating to find the age of something that is carbon base are firstly the possibility that carbon may be absorbed by some things making it more difficult to get an absolutely accurate age and secondly, with Carbon14 only having a half life of 5,568 years the maximum theoretical limit for detection is 100,000 years.


A researcher who uses carbon dating on anciet items?

The half life of C14 is about 5700 years, so items that are a few multiples of this time are suitable for carbon14 dating. Most archaeological items are suitable, and some young fossils.


Which method of radiometric dating is used mainly to date the remains of organisms that lived within the 50000 years?

carbon 14 dating


Which method of radiometric dating is used mainly to date the remains of organisms that lived within the last 50000 years?

carbon 14 dating


What are benefits of using uranium in dating the age of objects?

It is applicable to dating geological samples old from 104 to 2.106 years.


The dating method that can be used in some cases on rocks as young as 50000 years old that contain feldspar mica or amphobole is?

potassium-argon


What statement describes why the radiocarbon dating has a upward limit of 50000 years?

Radiocarbon dating has an upward limit of 50,000 years because of the half-life of carbon-14, which is about 5,730 years. After this time, there is very little carbon-14 left to measure accurately. Beyond 50,000 years, other radiometric dating methods, such as uranium-lead dating, are used to determine the age of geological samples.


Radiocarbon dating is only accurate for objects no more than?

Radiocarbon dating is only accurate for objects up to about 50,000 years old, as the amount of carbon-14 left in the sample becomes too small to measure accurately beyond that point. Beyond this age limit, other dating methods such as potassium-argon dating or luminescence dating may be used to determine the age of older objects.


An artifact is found that some are claiming is 30000 years old 3.1 percent of the original carbon14 is present The halflife of carbon14 is 5730 year?

To determine the age of the artifact, you can use the formula for exponential decay of radioactive elements: (N = N_0 \times (1/2)^{t/T}), where N is the final amount (3.1% of the original), N0 is the initial amount (100%), t is the time passed, and T is the half-life (5730 years). By substituting the values, you can solve for t, which will give you the age of the artifact.


Why is potassium-40 used to date objects older than 50000 years old?

Potassium-40 is used to date objects older than 50,000 years because it has a long half-life of 1.3 billion years, allowing for dating of very old samples. When potassium-40 decays, it turns into argon-40, which can be measured to determine the age of the sample.


Why is carbon14 dating not accurate for estimating the age of materials more than 50.000 years old?

Carbon-14 dating is not accurate for materials older than 50,000 years because the half-life of carbon-14 is about 5,730 years, meaning it decays rapidly over time, making it ineffective for measuring ancient material. Beyond this age, the amount of carbon-14 left in a sample is so small that it becomes difficult to accurately measure, leading to less reliable age estimates. Other dating methods, such as potassium-argon or uranium-lead dating, are better suited for older materials.


Why don't we use radiocarbon dating for dinosaur bones?

Radiocarbon dating is not used for dinosaur bones because dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, and radiocarbon dating is only effective for dating objects up to around 50,000 years old. Dinosaurs are too old for this method to accurately determine their age.