A single string instrument isn't especially loud, so larger sections are needed for balance.
Why is the string section called "The backbone of the orchestra"
Over the past couple hundred years, the orchestra added more winds and brass. As such, more strings were needed for everything to be in balance.
The heart of classical orchestra is really up to the person listening to decide. Majority of people will tell you the conductor is the heart of the classical orchestra. The conductor brings the music to life by the instruments and their players that play to his expertise of the music. But you have others say the brass section or the percussion section is the heart. It is the instruments and the players that have the soul and heart.
The conductor is the one who conducts the orchestra, managing speed, dynamics and instructing each instrumental section when to enter, and so forth.
I think that the orchestra was smaller and less grand then and now it is awesome.
Why is the string section called "The backbone of the orchestra"
No it's an orchestra so string and trumpets precision etc
They sit in front because wind instruments are louder, so winds are further back.
The true musical answer is - all of the ones included in a single musical piece - Musicians have argued this for many a long year. But all agree if a piece is written for all the instrument in the orchestra and one fails to play then it is noticeable. therefore every instrument that the composer wrote the piece for is vital.
Over the past couple hundred years, the orchestra added more winds and brass. As such, more strings were needed for everything to be in balance.
The heart of classical orchestra is really up to the person listening to decide. Majority of people will tell you the conductor is the heart of the classical orchestra. The conductor brings the music to life by the instruments and their players that play to his expertise of the music. But you have others say the brass section or the percussion section is the heart. It is the instruments and the players that have the soul and heart.
The conductor is the one who conducts the orchestra, managing speed, dynamics and instructing each instrumental section when to enter, and so forth.
it has strings like a violin cello lute and so on, I don't see why not.
No. By the romantic era, orchestras were so large that a harpsichord couldn't even be heard.
The string quartet dates from at least the 1750s, with the works of Franz Xaver Richter, Luigi Boccherini, and early Haydn. It's actually fairly hard to pin down, though. Two violins, viola, and cello is also the standard string section of an orchestra, so how do we know something was written for just four players and not for an ensemble of varying numbers? By the time we get to Haydn's mature quartets it is obvious--it would sound silly for a string orchestra to play these soloistic parts. But in his op. 1, there isn't that distinction. In fact, there are optional wind parts for some of the op. 1 quartets, which leads us to think they may also have been performed as divertimentos or even as small symphonies.
I think that the orchestra was smaller and less grand then and now it is awesome.
because they are the loudest. That's always what my band teacher told me. So brass instruments are really loud compared to the others, same with drums.