It depends on what kind of processor you are talking about. If you are talking about a CPU, the main processor in a computer, the reason for multiple cores and not a single very processor is a fairly simple answer. Imagine you have a toll booth (the CPU), with a number of lanes (cores in the CPU). In real life the technology only exists to build a toll booth of a certain size. So what happens? You build more lanes and add more toll booths.
That is basically the reason for building multiple cores.
they are single
No! He is not single! I am his girlfriend! I'm not playing around I really am!
yes
they can be classed as a group or a band it doesn't really matter but definitely not a SINGLE SINGER!
If by processor, you mean single or humbucker pickups, they can vary from as little as $20 to several hundred per coil. It all depends on your playing style and the annotation configuration of the sound you are looking for. It will also vary on the factory brand (Dimarzzio, Seynour Duncan, etc.) or some cheaply made knock-offs. Don't let the visuals fool you. Even the ugliest pickup can sound awesome.
Microprocessor is a single chip processor.
Designing a single powerful processor can lead to challenges in heat dissipation, power consumption, and manufacturing complexity. As performance scales, diminishing returns may occur due to physical limitations, making it less efficient. Furthermore, parallel processing through multiple simpler cores often provides better performance for diverse workloads, improving overall efficiency and responsiveness. Thus, a heterogeneous approach with multiple specialized processors can be more effective and adaptable to various tasks.
One of the heads of the design team in the 2005-2008 period was an anonymous Oregon Institute of Technology alumni. The credit for the invention of the Intel i7 processor can be given to no single person.
it a single processor
Designing a single powerful precosser can lead to several issues, including high costs, increased complexity, and potential inefficiencies. A versatile system may struggle to handle diverse inputs effectively, while a modular approach allows for specialization and optimization for different tasks. Additionally, a single unit may become a bottleneck or a single point of failure, whereas multiple systems can provide redundancy and flexibility.
Smaller processors are almost always cheaper, and use less electricity. Using a large number of processors in parallel also gives some redundancy, since a single processor node failing will not stop work from being performed.
Intel is currently preparing a six core processor for release.Four processor are the most you can get now.
It is called a micro-processor......a processor on a single chip
one single powerful processor consumes more energy generates more heat then multi-core processors ,A multi core processor will also be faster since there are multiple processors to handle the data manipulation instead of having to use time sharing.
Quite simply, a Uni (Single) core processor has only a single primary calculations core. A Multi (Dual, quad, hexi, etc) core processor has more than one primary calculations core.
AMD, Intel, ARM, VIA, Samsung, etc have all produced or manufactured a single core or variant of a single core processor at some point. I'm sure there's more, but I can't imagine you need to know all of them. If you meant FIRST single-core processor... The Intel 4004 was a 4-bit processor manufacturered in 1971-- This has the distinction of being the first fully complete processor contained on a single chip.
Four independent cores into a single package composed of a single IC. A dual-core processor contains two cores, and a quad-core processor contains four cores.